Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Enterocystoplasty or detrusor myectomy? Comparison of indications and outcomes for bladder augmentation.

PURPOSE: We review our experience with enterocystoplasty and detrusor myectomy to delineate clinical indications and compare operative outcomes with both types of bladder augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 61 patients who had undergone a total of 37 detrusor myectomies and 32 enterocystoplasties was performed. The patients were categorized into 6 diagnostic subsets representative of the clinical spectrum of indications for bladder augmentation.

RESULTS: For most clinical indications detrusor myectomy offered comparable success or significant improvement in bladder function without incurring the significant complication rate of enterocystoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS: Detrusor myectomy is a safe, successful method of bladder augmentation for most clinical indications. Myectomy does not hinder subsequent creation of an enterocystoplasty.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app