We have located links that may give you full text access.
The impact of primary stage on survival in patients with lymph node positive bladder cancer.
Journal of Urology 1999 January
PURPOSE: Contemporary series indicate that survival of cystectomy candidates with node positive bladder cancer is favorable when the primary tumor is confined to the bladder wall and lymph node involvement is minimal. However, these series lack node negative controls with a similar tumor stage to determine accurately the true impact of pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy on survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed disease specific survival in 686 consecutive cystectomy candidates of whom 193 (28.1%) had node positive disease at radical cystectomy. To correct for bias towards higher P category in the node positive group we subdivided groups into organ and nonorgan confined categories to compare outcome between node negative and node positive cases.
RESULTS: The frequency of organ confined disease in node positive cases was 22.8% compared to 59.2% in node negative cases. Although when analyzing the entire group disease specific survival was significantly decreased in node positive cases, after correction for P stage we found no statistically significant differences in survival between N0 and N1 cases in the organ confined group (p = 0.4267). Differences between N0 and N1 cases in nonorgan confined disease were statistically significant (p = 0.0276). Significance levels were more pronounced when cases with N2 or N3 categories were compared with node negative cases. Comparison of survival between node negative and N2 or N3 in either group revealed significant differences indicating limited impact of surgery alone at this disease stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with N1 disease seem to benefit from pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy as evidenced by similar outcome in those with node negative disease and similar P stage of the primary tumor. However, the observed benefit rapidly disappears when more than 1 lymph node is involved and additional therapy other than surgery seems appropriate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed disease specific survival in 686 consecutive cystectomy candidates of whom 193 (28.1%) had node positive disease at radical cystectomy. To correct for bias towards higher P category in the node positive group we subdivided groups into organ and nonorgan confined categories to compare outcome between node negative and node positive cases.
RESULTS: The frequency of organ confined disease in node positive cases was 22.8% compared to 59.2% in node negative cases. Although when analyzing the entire group disease specific survival was significantly decreased in node positive cases, after correction for P stage we found no statistically significant differences in survival between N0 and N1 cases in the organ confined group (p = 0.4267). Differences between N0 and N1 cases in nonorgan confined disease were statistically significant (p = 0.0276). Significance levels were more pronounced when cases with N2 or N3 categories were compared with node negative cases. Comparison of survival between node negative and N2 or N3 in either group revealed significant differences indicating limited impact of surgery alone at this disease stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with N1 disease seem to benefit from pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical cystectomy as evidenced by similar outcome in those with node negative disease and similar P stage of the primary tumor. However, the observed benefit rapidly disappears when more than 1 lymph node is involved and additional therapy other than surgery seems appropriate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app