We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The evaluation of a cadexomer iodine wound dressing on methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in acute wounds.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 1999 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Many bacteria have become resistant to commonly-used antibiotics.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a cadexomer iodine wound dressing on methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
METHOD: Partial thickness wounds were made on the backs of three pigs and inoculated with a known amount of MRSA. Wounds were treated with either cadexomer iodine dressing or vehicle dressing (without iodine), or they were left untreated. Three wounds from each treatment group per animal were cultured using quantitative scrub techniques after 24, 48, or 72 hours of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The cadexomer iodine dressing significantly reduced MRSA and total bacteria in the wounds as compared to both the no treatment control and vehicle. No significant differences were observed in the number of bacteria recovered between the no treatment control and cadexomer (vehicle) treated wounds. Cadexomer iodine may be an effective agent for preventing proliferation of MRSA in wounds.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a cadexomer iodine wound dressing on methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
METHOD: Partial thickness wounds were made on the backs of three pigs and inoculated with a known amount of MRSA. Wounds were treated with either cadexomer iodine dressing or vehicle dressing (without iodine), or they were left untreated. Three wounds from each treatment group per animal were cultured using quantitative scrub techniques after 24, 48, or 72 hours of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The cadexomer iodine dressing significantly reduced MRSA and total bacteria in the wounds as compared to both the no treatment control and vehicle. No significant differences were observed in the number of bacteria recovered between the no treatment control and cadexomer (vehicle) treated wounds. Cadexomer iodine may be an effective agent for preventing proliferation of MRSA in wounds.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app