We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with a cross-cylinder ablation.
Journal of Refractive Surgery 1999 March
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combined ablation of the steep and flat meridian to correct astigmatism with the excimer laser.
METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with myopic, mixed, or hyperopic astigmatism (mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -4.30 +/- 4.70 D [range, -12.50 to +1.50 D] and mean preoperative cylinder magnitude -3.40 +/- 1.40 D [range, -1.50 to -6.00 D]) underwent PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The surgical strategy involved ablating half the amount of the cylinder (in diopters) along steepest meridian, the other half in a subsequent step along the flattest meridian; thereafter, the spherical equivalent was corrected.
RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.07 +/- 0.87 D and mean cylinder was -0.44 +/- 0.36 D. Mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.86 +/- 0.13 compared to 0.75 +/- 0.22 preoperatively. Mean corneal haze was 0.67 +/- 0.31. No patient lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and there were no complaints about night halos or glare.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other ablation strategies, the cross-cylinder method creates a smooth transition (low dioptric gradient) between the treated and untreated cornea. This is achieved by first treating the cylinder and making the corneal surface spherical and then ablating the spherical component of the refractive error.
METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with myopic, mixed, or hyperopic astigmatism (mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -4.30 +/- 4.70 D [range, -12.50 to +1.50 D] and mean preoperative cylinder magnitude -3.40 +/- 1.40 D [range, -1.50 to -6.00 D]) underwent PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The surgical strategy involved ablating half the amount of the cylinder (in diopters) along steepest meridian, the other half in a subsequent step along the flattest meridian; thereafter, the spherical equivalent was corrected.
RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.07 +/- 0.87 D and mean cylinder was -0.44 +/- 0.36 D. Mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.86 +/- 0.13 compared to 0.75 +/- 0.22 preoperatively. Mean corneal haze was 0.67 +/- 0.31. No patient lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and there were no complaints about night halos or glare.
CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other ablation strategies, the cross-cylinder method creates a smooth transition (low dioptric gradient) between the treated and untreated cornea. This is achieved by first treating the cylinder and making the corneal surface spherical and then ablating the spherical component of the refractive error.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app