We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions.
British Journal of Surgery 1999 April
BACKGROUND: Clinically occult breast lesions are found with increasing frequency as a result of the widespread use of mammographic screening.
METHODS: This study reports a new localization technique in which a small quantity of 99mTc-labelled colloidal albumin is inoculated directly into the lesion under stereotactic-radiographic or ultrasonographic guidance. Correct positioning of the inoculum is checked by scintigraphy. A gamma ray detection probe is then used to locate the lesion and guide its surgical removal. The results of this method in 30 patients were compared with those obtained using the established hook wire method in another 30 patients.
RESULTS: In the wire localization group, the mean(s.d.) distance from the lesion centre to the specimen margin was 24.5(0.4) (range 15-45) mm. For the radioguided group the figures were 13.8(0.3) (range 5-25) mm. The mean(s.d.) lesion concentricity (difference between the maximum and minimum distance from the lesion border to specimen margin) was 6.2(0.4) (range 2-15) mm in the wire localization group and 3.8(0.2) (range 1-10) mm in the radioguided group.
CONCLUSION: Use of a gamma probe allowed rapid, easy and accurate removal of occult breast lesions. In comparison to the hook wire method, radioguided removal allows reduced excision volume and better lesion centring within the specimen.
METHODS: This study reports a new localization technique in which a small quantity of 99mTc-labelled colloidal albumin is inoculated directly into the lesion under stereotactic-radiographic or ultrasonographic guidance. Correct positioning of the inoculum is checked by scintigraphy. A gamma ray detection probe is then used to locate the lesion and guide its surgical removal. The results of this method in 30 patients were compared with those obtained using the established hook wire method in another 30 patients.
RESULTS: In the wire localization group, the mean(s.d.) distance from the lesion centre to the specimen margin was 24.5(0.4) (range 15-45) mm. For the radioguided group the figures were 13.8(0.3) (range 5-25) mm. The mean(s.d.) lesion concentricity (difference between the maximum and minimum distance from the lesion border to specimen margin) was 6.2(0.4) (range 2-15) mm in the wire localization group and 3.8(0.2) (range 1-10) mm in the radioguided group.
CONCLUSION: Use of a gamma probe allowed rapid, easy and accurate removal of occult breast lesions. In comparison to the hook wire method, radioguided removal allows reduced excision volume and better lesion centring within the specimen.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app