We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations.
Prostate 1999 April 2
BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncological efficacy, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: We describe an original technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed in 65 successive patients during 11 months.
RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was performed entirely by laparoscopy in 59 patients (91%). The median operating time was 265 min, including times for lymphadenectomy performed in 33% of patients. Preoperative complications included one rectal injury, sutured laparoscopically with an uneventful postoperative course, and one epigastric artery injury which needed secondary open procedure. The transfusion rate was 15.4% (10 patients). Median postoperative vesical catheterization lasted 7 days. The reduction of postoperative pain allowed rapid discharge of patients, by the fourth postoperative day in 60% of consenting patients. As regards oncological results, resection margins were negative in 57 patients (87.7%). The last prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay was undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) in 85.7% of the 42 patients in whom PSA was available more than 1 month after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy can be routinely performed by laparoscopy by an experienced team. Short-term oncological data were identical to the results of conventional retropubic surgery, and morbidity was low. The laparoscopic approach could constitute in the future a technical improvement over radical prostatectomy if long-term oncological results are confirmed and if improvement of intraoperative vision improves the functional results of this operation.
METHODS: We describe an original technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed in 65 successive patients during 11 months.
RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was performed entirely by laparoscopy in 59 patients (91%). The median operating time was 265 min, including times for lymphadenectomy performed in 33% of patients. Preoperative complications included one rectal injury, sutured laparoscopically with an uneventful postoperative course, and one epigastric artery injury which needed secondary open procedure. The transfusion rate was 15.4% (10 patients). Median postoperative vesical catheterization lasted 7 days. The reduction of postoperative pain allowed rapid discharge of patients, by the fourth postoperative day in 60% of consenting patients. As regards oncological results, resection margins were negative in 57 patients (87.7%). The last prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay was undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) in 85.7% of the 42 patients in whom PSA was available more than 1 month after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy can be routinely performed by laparoscopy by an experienced team. Short-term oncological data were identical to the results of conventional retropubic surgery, and morbidity was low. The laparoscopic approach could constitute in the future a technical improvement over radical prostatectomy if long-term oncological results are confirmed and if improvement of intraoperative vision improves the functional results of this operation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app