We have located links that may give you full text access.
Utility of a single beta HCG measurement to evaluate for absence of ectopic pregnancy.
Journal of Emergency Medicine 1999 May
The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal cutoff value (CV) and utility of a single serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin hormone (HCG) level in assessing the likelihood of ectopic pregnancy (ECP). A retrospective chart review was performed at an urban county hospital. The optimal CV was determined by comparing all available patients diagnosed with ECP and patients diagnosed with threatened abortion (TA) in the Emergency Department (ED) who subsequently delivered a baby at the same hospital. The utility of the test was assessed in a group of all known patients who presented to the ED with lower abdominal or pelvic pain or vaginal bleeding between 6 and 13 weeks estimated gestational age (EGA). There were 212 ECPs with measured HCGs. Only nine presented after 13 weeks EGA. The mean HCG value was 5,378 mIU/mL. There was no significant correlation between HCG and EGA. There were 132 TAs with measured HCGs who subsequently delivered. Only four TAs presented before 6 weeks EGA. Regarding the TA patients who presented between 6 and 13 weeks EGA, there were 81 with a mean HCG of 83,810 mIU/mL. Between 6 and 13 weeks EGA, HCG was not significantly correlated with EGA. The entire ECP group was compared with the TA group with 6-13 week EGA. A receiver-operating characteristic curve with nine HCG cutoff values was constructed. Clinically, the optimal CV was 40K. At this level, a test for the condition "absence of ECP" had a specificity of 99%, and only two of 212 ECPs in our group would test false-positive with an HCG value over 40K. When the test was applied to a group of 175 women who presented with pain or bleeding between 6 and 13 weeks EGA, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for an intrauterine pregnancy were 24% and 99.9 %, respectively. However, if this test was applied to all patients regardless of clinical findings, and then an ultrasound (U/S) algorithm was applied to the patients who had an HCG of less than 40K, it would predictably increase the rate of ECPs falsely identified as intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) by 1%, regardless of the false-positive rate of the U/S algorithm itself. Given the potential morbidity and mortality of undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy, ultimately neither this test nor any other that is less than 100% specific for IUP can be recommended instead of an initial U/S evaluation for patients who present at risk for ECP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app