We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Treatment of pilonidal sinus by primary closure with a transposed rhomboid flap compared with deep suturing: a prospective randomised clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: To assess two techniques of primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised study.
SETTING: University department of surgery, United Arab Emirates.
SUBJECTS: 46 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus disease, 24 treated by rhomboid flap transposition, and 22 by deep suturing technique.
MAIN OUTCOME: Early mobility and recurrence.
RESULTS: All patients in the rhomboid flap transposition group healed their wounds primarily compared with 17 in the primary deep suturing group (77%). (P = 0.02). Five patients wounds broke down as a result of haematoma and infection (23%). The mean hospital stay for the rhomboid flap technique was 6 days compared with 9 days after deep suturing, and the mean follow up for both groups was 18 months, the rhomboid flap group returned to work a mean of nine days earlier than the deep suturing group (23 days). No recurrence has been identified yet in the rhomboid flap group, while 2 recurrences have developed in the deep suturing group (9%).
CONCLUSION: Primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus with a transposed rhomboid flap is successful in the management of pilonidal sinus and is superior to primary closure by deep suturing.
DESIGN: Prospective randomised study.
SETTING: University department of surgery, United Arab Emirates.
SUBJECTS: 46 patients with chronic pilonidal sinus disease, 24 treated by rhomboid flap transposition, and 22 by deep suturing technique.
MAIN OUTCOME: Early mobility and recurrence.
RESULTS: All patients in the rhomboid flap transposition group healed their wounds primarily compared with 17 in the primary deep suturing group (77%). (P = 0.02). Five patients wounds broke down as a result of haematoma and infection (23%). The mean hospital stay for the rhomboid flap technique was 6 days compared with 9 days after deep suturing, and the mean follow up for both groups was 18 months, the rhomboid flap group returned to work a mean of nine days earlier than the deep suturing group (23 days). No recurrence has been identified yet in the rhomboid flap group, while 2 recurrences have developed in the deep suturing group (9%).
CONCLUSION: Primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus with a transposed rhomboid flap is successful in the management of pilonidal sinus and is superior to primary closure by deep suturing.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app