We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
The use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: preliminary findings.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1999 August
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the response of patients with temporomandibular disorders to Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) therapy.
METHODS: The 15 subjects enrolled in this uncontrolled study were diagnostically categorized and treated with 150 units of BTX-A. Both masseter muscles received 50 units each under eletromyographic (EMG) guidance. Similarly, both temporalis muscles were injected with 25 units each. Subjects were assessed at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included subjective pain by visual analog scale (VAS), measurement of bite force, interincisal opening, tenderness to palpation, and a functional index based on multiple VAS.
RESULTS: All mean outcome measures, with the exception of bite force, showed a significant (P = .05) difference between the preinjection assessment and the four follow-up assessments. No side effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: BTX-A injections produced a statistically significant improvement in four of five measured outcomes, specifically pain, function, mouth opening, and tenderness. No statistically significant changes were found in mean maximum voluntary contraction or in paired correlation of factors such as age, sex, diagnosis, depression index, or time of onset.
METHODS: The 15 subjects enrolled in this uncontrolled study were diagnostically categorized and treated with 150 units of BTX-A. Both masseter muscles received 50 units each under eletromyographic (EMG) guidance. Similarly, both temporalis muscles were injected with 25 units each. Subjects were assessed at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included subjective pain by visual analog scale (VAS), measurement of bite force, interincisal opening, tenderness to palpation, and a functional index based on multiple VAS.
RESULTS: All mean outcome measures, with the exception of bite force, showed a significant (P = .05) difference between the preinjection assessment and the four follow-up assessments. No side effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: BTX-A injections produced a statistically significant improvement in four of five measured outcomes, specifically pain, function, mouth opening, and tenderness. No statistically significant changes were found in mean maximum voluntary contraction or in paired correlation of factors such as age, sex, diagnosis, depression index, or time of onset.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app