We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Can echocardiography identify mildly hypertensive patients at high risk, left untreated based on current guidelines?
Journal of Hypertension 1999 June
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the decision to treat uncomplicated mild hypertension with drugs, in accordance with the World Health Organization - International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) guidelines based on a series of blood pressure (BP) measurements over 6 months, resulted in the treatment of patients at high risk on the basis of echocardiography.
METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients with mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90-105 mm Hg and/or systolic blood pressure 140-180 mm Hg) were examined by echocardiography at inclusion and followed up for 6 months by a single physician unaware of the echographic results.
RESULTS: Drug treatment was given to 48 patients, and 70 remained untreated. Treated patients had higher echographic indices than untreated patients (all P<0.05): left ventricular (LV) mass/body surface area (83.0+/-15.6 versus 75.3+/-14.8 g/m2), inter-ventricular septal thickness (9.7+/-1.7 versus 8.5+/-1.3 mm), LV posterior wall thickness (8.4+/-1.1 versus 7.8+/-1.1 mm), relative wall thickness (0.37+/-0.06 versus 0.34+/-0.06). LV geometry was normal in 98 patients, and 20 had LV concentric remodelling. The 10-year coronary disease risk (Framingham equation) was higher in the 20 patients with concentric remodelling than in those with normal LV geometry (10.4 versus 4.2%; P<0.005). Nine of these 20 patients were still untreated at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Rigorous application of the WHO/ISH clinical guidelines in a group of mild hypertensive patients led to the treatment of patients with slightly higher LV mass and more concentric LV geometry than were found in those not treated. However, a high-risk subgroup, with concentric remodelling, was not identified and left untreated.
METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients with mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90-105 mm Hg and/or systolic blood pressure 140-180 mm Hg) were examined by echocardiography at inclusion and followed up for 6 months by a single physician unaware of the echographic results.
RESULTS: Drug treatment was given to 48 patients, and 70 remained untreated. Treated patients had higher echographic indices than untreated patients (all P<0.05): left ventricular (LV) mass/body surface area (83.0+/-15.6 versus 75.3+/-14.8 g/m2), inter-ventricular septal thickness (9.7+/-1.7 versus 8.5+/-1.3 mm), LV posterior wall thickness (8.4+/-1.1 versus 7.8+/-1.1 mm), relative wall thickness (0.37+/-0.06 versus 0.34+/-0.06). LV geometry was normal in 98 patients, and 20 had LV concentric remodelling. The 10-year coronary disease risk (Framingham equation) was higher in the 20 patients with concentric remodelling than in those with normal LV geometry (10.4 versus 4.2%; P<0.005). Nine of these 20 patients were still untreated at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Rigorous application of the WHO/ISH clinical guidelines in a group of mild hypertensive patients led to the treatment of patients with slightly higher LV mass and more concentric LV geometry than were found in those not treated. However, a high-risk subgroup, with concentric remodelling, was not identified and left untreated.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app