We have located links that may give you full text access.
The urodynamic profile of prostatodynia.
BJU International 1999 September
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate urodynamically patients with prostatodynia, and thus define a specific urodynamic pattern that might add to the pathophysiology of the syndrome and possibly aid definitive treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients (mean age 38.1 years, sd 9.25, range 24-59) with symptoms suggestive of chronic prostatitis, e.g. dysuria, frequency of micturition and a burning sensation in the perineum, were classified as having prostatodynia after excluding prostatic infection by standard bacteriological methods. Thereafter, the patients were evaluated urodynamically, including the measurement of free flow-rate, filling (water) cystometry, a pressure/flow study of micturition, with fluoroscopy and electromyography of the external urethral sphincter.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (65%) had a low maximum free flow rate (Qmax ), with a mean (sd) of 10.91 (1.26) mL/s. Of the 42 patients who underwent filling cystometry, 26 (62%) had a first sensation of filling, and 28 (67%) a first desire to void, at low volumes (<150 mL and <300 mL, respectively). Of the 25 patients who underwent a pressure/flow study, 16 (64%) had an obstructive pattern of micturition, as defined by a low Qmax of 10.04 (1.38) mL/s and a high intravesical pressure at Qmax of 83.3 (5.3) cmH2O. The site of obstruction was at the level of the bladder neck, as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of these patients had a particular urodynamic pattern of functional infravesical obstruction at the level of the bladder neck and sensory disturbances.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients (mean age 38.1 years, sd 9.25, range 24-59) with symptoms suggestive of chronic prostatitis, e.g. dysuria, frequency of micturition and a burning sensation in the perineum, were classified as having prostatodynia after excluding prostatic infection by standard bacteriological methods. Thereafter, the patients were evaluated urodynamically, including the measurement of free flow-rate, filling (water) cystometry, a pressure/flow study of micturition, with fluoroscopy and electromyography of the external urethral sphincter.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (65%) had a low maximum free flow rate (Qmax ), with a mean (sd) of 10.91 (1.26) mL/s. Of the 42 patients who underwent filling cystometry, 26 (62%) had a first sensation of filling, and 28 (67%) a first desire to void, at low volumes (<150 mL and <300 mL, respectively). Of the 25 patients who underwent a pressure/flow study, 16 (64%) had an obstructive pattern of micturition, as defined by a low Qmax of 10.04 (1.38) mL/s and a high intravesical pressure at Qmax of 83.3 (5.3) cmH2O. The site of obstruction was at the level of the bladder neck, as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of these patients had a particular urodynamic pattern of functional infravesical obstruction at the level of the bladder neck and sensory disturbances.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app