We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Treatment of facial rhytids with a nonablative laser: a clinical and histologic study.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 1999 June
BACKGROUND: Current facial resurfacing modalities (laser, chemical peels, and dermabrasion) remove the epidermis and thus cause open wounds which carry significant risks and extended recovery periods. The nonablative laser is a novel Nd:YAG system designed to alleviate facial rhytids without injuring the epidermis. This new modality may offer patients rhytid removal without the risk seen in currently used resurfacing techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel nonablative laser system and assess its safety profile and efficacy.
METHODS: Ten patients received laser treatments of their periocular rhytids and postauricular skin. Clinical variables (rhytid severity, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, scarring, and level of discomfort) were assessed at 1 and 3 months posttreatment. Postauricular skin biopsies were taken both pre- and posttreatment for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: Patient discomfort was minimal. Three months posttreatment, 4 of 10 patients showed a one-point improvement in periocular rhytid severity when judged on a six-point scale. The results were not statistically significant. Biopsy analysis showed a small posttreatment increase in the amount of dermal collagen in three patients. A small decrease in collagen was noted in one patient. Three patients also showed a small posttreatment increase in the degree homogenization of dermal collagen. No change from baseline was noted in other assessed histologic parameters. Complications observed included hyperpigmentation in three patients and pitted scarring in three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The nonablative laser gave clinically subtle and statistically insignificant improvement in rhytid severity. Unfortunately its use was associated with complications that included hyperpigmentation and scarring. This technology may eventually offer patients a new resurfacing option, but its efficacy and complication rate must be improved first.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel nonablative laser system and assess its safety profile and efficacy.
METHODS: Ten patients received laser treatments of their periocular rhytids and postauricular skin. Clinical variables (rhytid severity, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, scarring, and level of discomfort) were assessed at 1 and 3 months posttreatment. Postauricular skin biopsies were taken both pre- and posttreatment for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: Patient discomfort was minimal. Three months posttreatment, 4 of 10 patients showed a one-point improvement in periocular rhytid severity when judged on a six-point scale. The results were not statistically significant. Biopsy analysis showed a small posttreatment increase in the amount of dermal collagen in three patients. A small decrease in collagen was noted in one patient. Three patients also showed a small posttreatment increase in the degree homogenization of dermal collagen. No change from baseline was noted in other assessed histologic parameters. Complications observed included hyperpigmentation in three patients and pitted scarring in three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The nonablative laser gave clinically subtle and statistically insignificant improvement in rhytid severity. Unfortunately its use was associated with complications that included hyperpigmentation and scarring. This technology may eventually offer patients a new resurfacing option, but its efficacy and complication rate must be improved first.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app