We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Clinical and histologic evaluation of an indwelling, inflatable, long-term laryngeal stent in the canine model.
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1999 September
OBJECTIVE: The goal was assessment of a revolutionary approach to laryngeal stenting. A radically designed, atraumatic, inflatable, low-pressure, high-volume, endoscopically inserted laryngeal stent for effective intralaryngeal support or long-term prevention of aspiration was prospectively evaluated in a canine model to reveal any significant short- and long-term anatomic and functional changes in the larynx.
METHODS: A self-sustaining, tube-free, long-term flap tracheostomy was performed in 14 dogs, followed by endoscopic laryngeal stent insertion. The stents were inflated, and their intraluminal pressures were monitored daily. The stenting period ranged between 3 and 46 days (mean 27.4 days). The animals were then euthanized, and total laryngectomy was performed. The larynges underwent gross and microscopic examinations, and a grading scale of reactive changes caused by the stent placement was created on the basis of the findings.
RESULTS: Dye studies for aspiration were negative in all animals. Gross findings consisted of varying degrees of small ulceration, localized polypoid lesions, and granulomas. Grossly, 9 dogs exhibited small superficial ulceration of the true vocal cords and posterior commissure. Six dogs developed minor polyps or polypoid changes and/or granulomas, respectively. No gross changes were seen in 2 of the dogs. Histopathologically, 10 dogs demonstrated grade I or II histopathologic changes. Only 4 of the dogs exhibited inflammation extending into the underlying cartilages, grade III. One dog did not complete the observation period.
CONCLUSION: This new stent demonstrated safety and biocompatibility with minimal local tissue reaction to its extended long-term placement. Good tolerance to the stent was documented, with minimal side effects similar to those that would be observed in human subjects after endotracheal intubation. When followed up in human patients, such minimal lesions have not resulted in significant long-lasting functional impairments. These initial results would indicate that this stent is well tolerated for long-term application and qualify as the preferred device for both management of aspiration and postoperative endolaryngeal bolstering support.
METHODS: A self-sustaining, tube-free, long-term flap tracheostomy was performed in 14 dogs, followed by endoscopic laryngeal stent insertion. The stents were inflated, and their intraluminal pressures were monitored daily. The stenting period ranged between 3 and 46 days (mean 27.4 days). The animals were then euthanized, and total laryngectomy was performed. The larynges underwent gross and microscopic examinations, and a grading scale of reactive changes caused by the stent placement was created on the basis of the findings.
RESULTS: Dye studies for aspiration were negative in all animals. Gross findings consisted of varying degrees of small ulceration, localized polypoid lesions, and granulomas. Grossly, 9 dogs exhibited small superficial ulceration of the true vocal cords and posterior commissure. Six dogs developed minor polyps or polypoid changes and/or granulomas, respectively. No gross changes were seen in 2 of the dogs. Histopathologically, 10 dogs demonstrated grade I or II histopathologic changes. Only 4 of the dogs exhibited inflammation extending into the underlying cartilages, grade III. One dog did not complete the observation period.
CONCLUSION: This new stent demonstrated safety and biocompatibility with minimal local tissue reaction to its extended long-term placement. Good tolerance to the stent was documented, with minimal side effects similar to those that would be observed in human subjects after endotracheal intubation. When followed up in human patients, such minimal lesions have not resulted in significant long-lasting functional impairments. These initial results would indicate that this stent is well tolerated for long-term application and qualify as the preferred device for both management of aspiration and postoperative endolaryngeal bolstering support.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app