We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Maxillary growth in patients with clefts following secondary alveolar bone grafting.
Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal 1999 September
OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluated the effects of secondary alveolar bone grafting on subsequent maxillary growth in cleft patients.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study. Nineteen patients who had received secondary alveolar bone grafts were matched to a control sample by sex, cleft, availability of longitudinal records, and presurgical cranial base dimensions and growth direction. All patients had at least two lateral cephalometric radiographs before surgery and two radiographs after surgery.
SETTING: The records were obtained from the Longitudinal Growth Study of the Lancaster (Pennsylvania) Cleft Palate Clinic.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients had received similar primary surgical procedures by the same surgeon, no orthopedics, and similar mixed-dentition orthodontics. Secondary alveolar bone grafting was the only surgical intervention different between the two groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six measures of maxillary sagittal and vertical growth were taken from 235 radiographs. Slopes of the regression lines for each growth dimension were compared between groups both pre- and postsurgically.
RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in maxillary sagittal or vertical growth following the grafting procedure. Anterior maxillary vertical growth rates decreased in the grafted group when their pre- and postsurgical rates were compared. Several growth trends in the postsurgical period were found to be continuations of the rates documented presurgically and unrelated to the grafting procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated longitudinally, maxillary growth in patients having received secondary alveolar bone grafting did not differ from a group of matched controls.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study. Nineteen patients who had received secondary alveolar bone grafts were matched to a control sample by sex, cleft, availability of longitudinal records, and presurgical cranial base dimensions and growth direction. All patients had at least two lateral cephalometric radiographs before surgery and two radiographs after surgery.
SETTING: The records were obtained from the Longitudinal Growth Study of the Lancaster (Pennsylvania) Cleft Palate Clinic.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients had received similar primary surgical procedures by the same surgeon, no orthopedics, and similar mixed-dentition orthodontics. Secondary alveolar bone grafting was the only surgical intervention different between the two groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six measures of maxillary sagittal and vertical growth were taken from 235 radiographs. Slopes of the regression lines for each growth dimension were compared between groups both pre- and postsurgically.
RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in maxillary sagittal or vertical growth following the grafting procedure. Anterior maxillary vertical growth rates decreased in the grafted group when their pre- and postsurgical rates were compared. Several growth trends in the postsurgical period were found to be continuations of the rates documented presurgically and unrelated to the grafting procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated longitudinally, maxillary growth in patients having received secondary alveolar bone grafting did not differ from a group of matched controls.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app