We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Characterization of the aspheric corneal surface with intrastromal corneal ring segments.
Journal of Refractive Surgery 1999 September
PURPOSE: Anterior corneal surface asphericity was examined in eyes of Phase II clinical trial participants, before and after intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS, Intacs) refractive surgery, and surveyed for relationship to clinical visual performance.
METHODS: Aspheric test objects with surface asphericity (Q) ranging from -0.01 Q to -1.44 Q and base radius of curvatures ranging from 7.5 mm to 9.0 mm were measured topographically using videokeratography. Radius of curvature asphericity profile plots were produced for test objects and compared to similar plots created for trial participant eyes (n=25) to quantify corneal asphericity. The potential effects of different amounts of corneal asphericity were assessed using measurement of uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity and photopic contrast sensitivity.
RESULTS: Preoperative corneal asphericity ranged from -0.01 Q to -0.81 Q and postoperative from -0.01 Q to -1.44 Q. Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was significantly related to corneal asphericity; more myopic eyes tended to have more prolate corneal asphericity. Corneal asphericity was not significantly related to spectacle-corrected visual acuity or photopic contrast sensitivity, before or after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative corneal asphericity values demonstrated that intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs) produced a prolate aspheric surface for myopic correction from -1.00 D to -6.00 D. This study indicated that the range of corneal asphericity measured in these 25 eyes, before and after surgery, provided good visual acuity and normal contrast sensitivity.
METHODS: Aspheric test objects with surface asphericity (Q) ranging from -0.01 Q to -1.44 Q and base radius of curvatures ranging from 7.5 mm to 9.0 mm were measured topographically using videokeratography. Radius of curvature asphericity profile plots were produced for test objects and compared to similar plots created for trial participant eyes (n=25) to quantify corneal asphericity. The potential effects of different amounts of corneal asphericity were assessed using measurement of uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity and photopic contrast sensitivity.
RESULTS: Preoperative corneal asphericity ranged from -0.01 Q to -0.81 Q and postoperative from -0.01 Q to -1.44 Q. Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was significantly related to corneal asphericity; more myopic eyes tended to have more prolate corneal asphericity. Corneal asphericity was not significantly related to spectacle-corrected visual acuity or photopic contrast sensitivity, before or after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative corneal asphericity values demonstrated that intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs) produced a prolate aspheric surface for myopic correction from -1.00 D to -6.00 D. This study indicated that the range of corneal asphericity measured in these 25 eyes, before and after surgery, provided good visual acuity and normal contrast sensitivity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app