JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Progression of mitral regurgitation: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to define the rates and determinants of progression of organic mitral regurgitation (MR).

BACKGROUND: Severe MR has major clinical consequences, but the rates and determinants of progression of the degree of regurgitation are unknown. Quantitative Doppler echocardiographic methods allow the quantitation of regurgitant volume (RVol), regurgitant fraction (RF) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) to define progression of MR.

METHODS: In a prospective study of MR progression, 74 patients had two quantitative Doppler echocardiographic examinations of MR (with at least two methods) 561 +/- 423 days apart without an intervening event.

RESULTS: Progression of MR was observed, with increase in RVol (77 +/- 46 ml vs. 65 +/- 40 ml, p < 0.0001), RF (47 +/- 16% vs. 43% +/- 15%, p < 0.0001), and ERO (50 +/- 35 mm2 vs. 41 +/- 28 mm2, p < 0.0001). Annual rates (95% confidence interval) were, respectively, 7.4 ml/year (5.1, 9.7), 2.9%/year (1.9, 3.9) and 5.9 mm2/year (3.9, 7.8). However, wide individual variation was observed, and regression and progression of RVol >8 ml was found in 11% and 51%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of progression of RVol were progression of the lesions, particularly a new flail leaflet (p = 0.0003), and progression of mitral annulus diameter (p = 0.0001). Regression of MR was associated with marked changes in afterload, particularly decreased blood pressure (p = 0.008). No significant effect of treatment was detected.

CONCLUSIONS: Organic MR tends to progress over time with increase in volume overload (RVol) due to increase in ERO. Progression of MR is variable and determined by progression of lesions or mitral annulus size. These data should help plan follow up of patients with organic MR and future intervention trials.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app