We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Do routinely measured delivery variables predict anal sphincter outcome?
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1999 October
PURPOSE: Trauma to the anal sphincter is a recognized complication of primiparous childbirth. This damage may be compounded during subsequent deliveries leading to symptoms. Earlier work is inconclusive as to which delivery variables are associated with such damage and may prove useful in predicting its occurrence, thereby allowing the potential for intervention in these later deliveries to protect the traumatized anal sphincter. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether routinely recorded obstetric variables can be correlated to anal sphincter damage in a consecutive series of females.
METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken in a single maternity unit. Patients delivering were assessed before discharge using a symptom questionnaire and endoanal ultrasound. Delivery data were collected prospectively and analyzed statistically to see if a significant difference existed in the presence of an anal sphincter defect.
RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were assessed. Endosonography revealed sphincter injuries in 8.7 percent of the normal vaginal delivery group and 83 percent of the forceps delivery group. No correlation was found between head circumference, baby weight, maternal body mass index, epidurals, episiotomy, length of each stage of labor, and duration of active pushing. Forceps delivery was the only factor to be significantly associated with sphincter trauma.
CONCLUSION: Besides forceps delivery, commonly measured delivery variables are not useful predictors of anal sphincter trauma. Normal vaginal deliveries do not warrant routine postnatal anorectal assessment, but this should be routine for all instrument deliveries.
METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken in a single maternity unit. Patients delivering were assessed before discharge using a symptom questionnaire and endoanal ultrasound. Delivery data were collected prospectively and analyzed statistically to see if a significant difference existed in the presence of an anal sphincter defect.
RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were assessed. Endosonography revealed sphincter injuries in 8.7 percent of the normal vaginal delivery group and 83 percent of the forceps delivery group. No correlation was found between head circumference, baby weight, maternal body mass index, epidurals, episiotomy, length of each stage of labor, and duration of active pushing. Forceps delivery was the only factor to be significantly associated with sphincter trauma.
CONCLUSION: Besides forceps delivery, commonly measured delivery variables are not useful predictors of anal sphincter trauma. Normal vaginal deliveries do not warrant routine postnatal anorectal assessment, but this should be routine for all instrument deliveries.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app