We have located links that may give you full text access.
Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder of the abdomen: CT evaluation in 51 patients.
Radiology 1999 October
PURPOSE: To study the appearance and distribution of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) at abdominal computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed pretreatment abdominal CT scans in 51 patients (mean age, 36 years) with PTLD after solid organ transplantation. All diagnoses were proved at either abdominal (n = 26) or extraabdominal (n = 25) pathologic examination. Presence or absence of abdominal involvement, appearance and distribution of disease, and association with abdominal symptoms were all analyzed.
RESULTS: CT scans were abnormal in 36 of the 51 patients (71%). Fifteen patients (29%) had no CT, clinical, or pathologic evidence of abdominal involvement. Of the 36 patients with abdominal PTLD at CT, 22% had lymph node enlargement, 28% splenic involvement, and 81% extranodal or extrasplenic involvement. Extranodal abdominal sites included liver (53%), small bowel (25%), kidney (17%), mesentery (14%), adrenal gland (8%), abdominal wall (8%), colon (6%), stomach (3%), and gallbladder (3%). Frequency of abdominal involvement was greater for heart and liver transplant recipients (94%) than for lung and kidney transplant recipients (58%) (P < .01). Seventeen of 36 patients (47%) with abdominal PTLD had no evidence of extraabdominal disease.
CONCLUSION: Extranodal involvement is more common than splenic or nodal involvement in patients with abdominal PTLD. The presence of such findings in a patient after transplantation strongly suggests the diagnosis of PTLD and warrants aggressive evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed pretreatment abdominal CT scans in 51 patients (mean age, 36 years) with PTLD after solid organ transplantation. All diagnoses were proved at either abdominal (n = 26) or extraabdominal (n = 25) pathologic examination. Presence or absence of abdominal involvement, appearance and distribution of disease, and association with abdominal symptoms were all analyzed.
RESULTS: CT scans were abnormal in 36 of the 51 patients (71%). Fifteen patients (29%) had no CT, clinical, or pathologic evidence of abdominal involvement. Of the 36 patients with abdominal PTLD at CT, 22% had lymph node enlargement, 28% splenic involvement, and 81% extranodal or extrasplenic involvement. Extranodal abdominal sites included liver (53%), small bowel (25%), kidney (17%), mesentery (14%), adrenal gland (8%), abdominal wall (8%), colon (6%), stomach (3%), and gallbladder (3%). Frequency of abdominal involvement was greater for heart and liver transplant recipients (94%) than for lung and kidney transplant recipients (58%) (P < .01). Seventeen of 36 patients (47%) with abdominal PTLD had no evidence of extraabdominal disease.
CONCLUSION: Extranodal involvement is more common than splenic or nodal involvement in patients with abdominal PTLD. The presence of such findings in a patient after transplantation strongly suggests the diagnosis of PTLD and warrants aggressive evaluation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app