We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Assessment and significance of mediastinal bulk in Hodgkin's disease: comparison between computed tomography and chest radiography.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 1999 August
PURPOSE: In Hodgkin's disease (HD), mediastinal bulk is currently defined from chest radiograph (CXR) measurements as a ratio of the maximum transverse mass diameter to the internal thoracic diameter at T5/6 level > or = 0.33. We evaluated how computed tomographic (CT) measurements of bulk correspond to those obtained from the CXR and correlated nodal mass long axis diameter with freedom from progression.
METHODS: Ninety-five adult patients who had a CXR thoracic ratio of greater than 0.3 and a CT scan within 28 days of the CXR were included in the study, provided that both investigations were performed before the start of treatment. Measurements of the widest mediastinal diameter and internal thoracic diameter were made on both CXR and CT scan. The thoracic ratio (TR) was calculated for each modality and compared using paired t tests. The longest diameter of the largest individual nodal mass (LIM(CT)) was also measured from the CT and correlated with freedom from progression using Cox regression.
RESULTS: There was excellent correlation between CT and CXR for measurement of TR, with TR(CT) greater than TR(CXR) (mean difference of 2%). A TR(CT) of 0. 35 was found to be equivalent to a TR(CXR) of 0.33. No single measurement of nodal size correlated with the current definition of bulk. However LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm did correlate with increased risk of progressive HD (P =.03), even after adjustment for other prognostic variables (chemotherapy regimen and Hasenclever Prognostic Index).
CONCLUSION: Excellent correlation was observed between assessment of TR by CXR and CT scan. The longest diameter of the LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm was found to be associated with an increased risk of disease progression.
METHODS: Ninety-five adult patients who had a CXR thoracic ratio of greater than 0.3 and a CT scan within 28 days of the CXR were included in the study, provided that both investigations were performed before the start of treatment. Measurements of the widest mediastinal diameter and internal thoracic diameter were made on both CXR and CT scan. The thoracic ratio (TR) was calculated for each modality and compared using paired t tests. The longest diameter of the largest individual nodal mass (LIM(CT)) was also measured from the CT and correlated with freedom from progression using Cox regression.
RESULTS: There was excellent correlation between CT and CXR for measurement of TR, with TR(CT) greater than TR(CXR) (mean difference of 2%). A TR(CT) of 0. 35 was found to be equivalent to a TR(CXR) of 0.33. No single measurement of nodal size correlated with the current definition of bulk. However LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm did correlate with increased risk of progressive HD (P =.03), even after adjustment for other prognostic variables (chemotherapy regimen and Hasenclever Prognostic Index).
CONCLUSION: Excellent correlation was observed between assessment of TR by CXR and CT scan. The longest diameter of the LIM(CT) greater than 10 cm was found to be associated with an increased risk of disease progression.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app