We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Laser skin resurfacing of the face with a combined CO2/Er:YAG laser.
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2000 Februrary
BACKGROUND: A combined, dual-wavelength CO2/Er:YAG laser system having the ability to deliver both clean ablation of skin with the erbium wavelength and a simultaneous deeper penetrating subablative thermal pulse of CO2 was developed for full-face resurfacing. The CO2 component can be pulsed from 1 to 100 msec at a power of 1-10 W with the Er:YAG component pulsed at 350 microsec at 1.7 J/cm2 through either a computer pattern generator with 3 mm diameter spot size or through a noncollimated spot ranging from 0.2 to 8 mm in diameter. Our previous study using this laser on the neck using a 4-8 mm diameter spot with Er:YAG fluence at 1.7 J and the CO2 at 5 W with a 50 msec pulse at a frequency of 10 Hz showed a higher degree of overall patient satisfaction, as well as improvement in skin texture and skin color, compared to patients treated with an Er:YAG laser alone.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the CO2/Er:YAG laser treatment modality in facial resurfacing.
METHODS: Ten patients were treated with four passes at 1.7 J with a 4 mm diameter spot and the CO2 at 5 W with a 50-msec pulse at a frequency of 10 Hz. Photoaging scores as well as thermal damage and new collagen formation were compared immediately before and after treatment as well as at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average pretreatment periorbital score was 6.2 The average posttreatment periorbital scores were 4.2 (P =.0239) at 2 weeks postoperatively (32% improvement) and 3.8 (P =.0028) at 3 months postoperatively (38% improvement). The average pretreatment perioral score was 5.9. The average posttreatment perioral scores were 3.0 (P =.0001) at 2 weeks postoperatively (49% improvement) and 3.3 (P =.0009) at 3 months postoperatively (44% improvement). The average pretreatment cheek score was 4.7. The average posttreatment cheek scores were 2.7 (P =.0066) at 2 weeks postoperatively (43% improvement) and 3.8 (P =. 0152) at 3 months postoperatively (36% improvement). The average pretreatment forehead score was 4.7. The average posttreatment forehead scores were 3.8 (P =.0340) at 2 weeks postoperatively (33% improvement) and 3.6 (P =.0147) at 3 months postoperatively (37% improvement). The average depth of collagen measured in the dermis pretreatment was 29 microm. The average depth of collagen 3 months posttreatment was 54 microm. This is an average increase of 25 microm or an 86% increase in collagen (P =.006). The average thermal damage immediately after treatment was 20 microm.
CONCLUSION: The CO2/Er:YAG laser utilized with four passes at the above-mentioned parameters results in a similar degree of improvement as other forms of laser resurfacing with high-energy, short-pulsed CO2 lasers.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the CO2/Er:YAG laser treatment modality in facial resurfacing.
METHODS: Ten patients were treated with four passes at 1.7 J with a 4 mm diameter spot and the CO2 at 5 W with a 50-msec pulse at a frequency of 10 Hz. Photoaging scores as well as thermal damage and new collagen formation were compared immediately before and after treatment as well as at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The average pretreatment periorbital score was 6.2 The average posttreatment periorbital scores were 4.2 (P =.0239) at 2 weeks postoperatively (32% improvement) and 3.8 (P =.0028) at 3 months postoperatively (38% improvement). The average pretreatment perioral score was 5.9. The average posttreatment perioral scores were 3.0 (P =.0001) at 2 weeks postoperatively (49% improvement) and 3.3 (P =.0009) at 3 months postoperatively (44% improvement). The average pretreatment cheek score was 4.7. The average posttreatment cheek scores were 2.7 (P =.0066) at 2 weeks postoperatively (43% improvement) and 3.8 (P =. 0152) at 3 months postoperatively (36% improvement). The average pretreatment forehead score was 4.7. The average posttreatment forehead scores were 3.8 (P =.0340) at 2 weeks postoperatively (33% improvement) and 3.6 (P =.0147) at 3 months postoperatively (37% improvement). The average depth of collagen measured in the dermis pretreatment was 29 microm. The average depth of collagen 3 months posttreatment was 54 microm. This is an average increase of 25 microm or an 86% increase in collagen (P =.006). The average thermal damage immediately after treatment was 20 microm.
CONCLUSION: The CO2/Er:YAG laser utilized with four passes at the above-mentioned parameters results in a similar degree of improvement as other forms of laser resurfacing with high-energy, short-pulsed CO2 lasers.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app