Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Clinical analysis of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in a community hospital--comparison of elderly and non-elderly patients].

A comparative study of 890 patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in a community hospital was performed. The patients were divided into an elderly patient group and a non-elderly patient group. The elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia exhibited frequent atypical symptoms such as dyspnea, consciousness disturbance and complication of shock, and also were frequently in a poor nutritional condition. The causative microorganism was isolated in 40.8% of the elderly patients and in 44.0% of the non-elderly patients. Polymicrobial agents were detected frequently in the elderly patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae (19.4%), MSSA (16.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.1%) and Haemophilus influenzae (15.0%) were frequently isolated from the sputum of the elderly patients, while Mycoplasma pneumoniae (25.2%), H. influenzae (15.0%), S. pneumoniae (12.2%) and MSSA (10.2%) were frequently isolated from that of the non-elderly patients. Regarding treatment with antibiotics, therapy with a single antibiotic therapy, such as cephem or carbapenem was carried out for the elderly patients, while new quinolone or tetracycline was administered to the non-elderly patients. Although the treatment with antibiotics was adequate according to the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society, the prognosis was poor; i.e.) in the elderly patients an efficacy rate of 74.3% and a mortality rate of 9.5%. In the non-elderly patients, the prognosis was good; i.e.) an efficacy rate of 88.0% and a mortality rate of 1.7%. These results suggest that the most important factors affecting the prognosis were the general condition of elderly patients and delay in an adequate diagnosis and treatment because of atypical clinical findings.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app