We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Validation of a questionnaire to assess fecal incontinence and associated risk factors: Fecal Incontinence Questionnaire.
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000 Februrary
PURPOSE: Although fecal incontinence is a topic of considerable importance, there are no validated self-report measures of fecal incontinence available. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure fecal incontinence and its risk factors in the community.
METHOD: The reliability and concurrent validity of the fecal incontinence questionnaire were measured by test-retest procedures in a population of clinic patients. The questionnaire was created for a sixth-grade reading level, with large print. Ninety-four adult patients were surveyed. Thirty-four patients repeated the questionnaire through the mail. Forty-one patients were independently retested over the telephone by a physician to assess concurrent validity. Nine patients refused retest, and ten patients did not respond to a second contact.
RESULTS: The fecal incontinence questionnaire was well understood and well accepted. Reliability (overall median kappa, 0.68; interquartile range, 0.03-1) and validity (overall median kappa, 0.59; interquartile range, 0.27-1) were acceptable for the mailed retest and the telephone retest, respectively. The presence of fecal incontinence as measured by questionnaire was greatly increased when compared with physician history in clinical records; only 3 percent of patients reported no fecal incontinence on the questionnaire when the clinic chart had documented this problem.
CONCLUSION: Our initial results indicated that this new self-report questionnaire is a useful tool for assessing the presence of fecal incontinence in the population and has greater sensitivity compared with a standard physician interview. Specific attention should be given to identifying fecal incontinence and associated symptoms during history taking.
METHOD: The reliability and concurrent validity of the fecal incontinence questionnaire were measured by test-retest procedures in a population of clinic patients. The questionnaire was created for a sixth-grade reading level, with large print. Ninety-four adult patients were surveyed. Thirty-four patients repeated the questionnaire through the mail. Forty-one patients were independently retested over the telephone by a physician to assess concurrent validity. Nine patients refused retest, and ten patients did not respond to a second contact.
RESULTS: The fecal incontinence questionnaire was well understood and well accepted. Reliability (overall median kappa, 0.68; interquartile range, 0.03-1) and validity (overall median kappa, 0.59; interquartile range, 0.27-1) were acceptable for the mailed retest and the telephone retest, respectively. The presence of fecal incontinence as measured by questionnaire was greatly increased when compared with physician history in clinical records; only 3 percent of patients reported no fecal incontinence on the questionnaire when the clinic chart had documented this problem.
CONCLUSION: Our initial results indicated that this new self-report questionnaire is a useful tool for assessing the presence of fecal incontinence in the population and has greater sensitivity compared with a standard physician interview. Specific attention should be given to identifying fecal incontinence and associated symptoms during history taking.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app