We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.
Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal Canadien de Chirurgie 2000 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether resurfacing the patellar component during total knee replacement (TKR) influences the clinical outcome.
DESIGN: A retrospective study of data gathered prospectively during the recovery course of patients who underwent TKR with or without patellar resurfacing.
SETTING: Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, NS.
PATIENTS: One hundred and eighty-five patients operated on between 1992 and 1995. The inclusion criteria were (a) osteoarthritis, (b) replacement carried out by 2 independent surgeons, (c) no comorbid illness such as rheumatoid arthritis, cancer or infection, (d) pre- and postoperative attendance at the assessment clinics.
INTERVENTION: TKR with (45) or without (140) patellar replacement.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion (ROM), pain assessment, Hospital Severity Score (HSS) and complications.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with respect to ROM, pain, HSS and complications postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing the patella during TKR does not seem to influence the clinical outcome with respect to ROM, pain and overall complications. The decision should be based on individual criteria, depending on the preoperative and intraoperative findings. Randomized clinical trials assessing ROM, pain, complications and cost-effectiveness with long-term follow-up are necessary to further investigate this controversial issue.
DESIGN: A retrospective study of data gathered prospectively during the recovery course of patients who underwent TKR with or without patellar resurfacing.
SETTING: Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, NS.
PATIENTS: One hundred and eighty-five patients operated on between 1992 and 1995. The inclusion criteria were (a) osteoarthritis, (b) replacement carried out by 2 independent surgeons, (c) no comorbid illness such as rheumatoid arthritis, cancer or infection, (d) pre- and postoperative attendance at the assessment clinics.
INTERVENTION: TKR with (45) or without (140) patellar replacement.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Range of motion (ROM), pain assessment, Hospital Severity Score (HSS) and complications.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with respect to ROM, pain, HSS and complications postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing the patella during TKR does not seem to influence the clinical outcome with respect to ROM, pain and overall complications. The decision should be based on individual criteria, depending on the preoperative and intraoperative findings. Randomized clinical trials assessing ROM, pain, complications and cost-effectiveness with long-term follow-up are necessary to further investigate this controversial issue.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app