Survival related to lymph node involvement in lung cancer after sleeve lobectomy compared with pneumonectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes after sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer distributed according to their nodal involvement status.

METHODS: Of 1172 patients in whom primary non-small cell lung carcinoma, including mediastinal lymph nodes, was completely excised, 151 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy and 60 underwent pneumonectomy. For bias reduction in comparison with a nonrandomized control group, we paired 60 patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy with 60 patients undergoing pneumonectomy by using the nearest available matching method.

RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality was 2% (1/60) in the pneumonectomy group and 0% in the sleeve lobectomy group. Postoperative complications occurred in 13% of patients in the sleeve lobectomy group and in 22% of those in the pneumonectomy group. Local recurrences occurred in 8% of patients in the sleeve lobectomy group and in 10% of those in the pneumonectomy group. The overall 5- and 10-year survivals for the sleeve lobectomy group were 48% and 36%, respectively, whereas those for the pneumonectomy group were 28% and 19%, respectively (P =.005). Multivariable analysis showed that the operative procedure, T factor, and N factor were significant independent prognostic factors and revealed that survival after sleeve lobectomy was significantly longer than that after pneumonectomy (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that sleeve lobectomy should be performed instead of pneumonectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer regardless of their nodal status whenever complete resection can be achieved because this is a lung-saving procedure with lower postoperative risks and is as curative as pneumonectomy.