Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Calcium channel blockers for acute traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death and disability. Calcium channel blockers have been used in an attempt to prevent cerebral vasospasm after injury, maintain blood flow to the brain and so prevent further damage.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with acute traumatic brain injury and in a subgroup of brain injury patients with traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage.

SEARCH STRATEGY: Hand searching and electronic searching for randomized controlled trials available by October 1997.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in patients with all levels of severity of clinically diagnosed acute traumatic brain injury.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers (JL and CG) independently assessed the identified studies for eligibility and extracted data from each study. Summary odds ratios were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

MAIN RESULTS: Four RCTs were identified as eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The effect of calcium channel blockers on the risk of death was reported in all RCTs. The pooled odds ratio for the four studies was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0. 70 to 1.17). For the three RCTs that reported death and severe disability the pooled odds ratio was 0.85 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.07). In the two RCTs which reported the risk of death in a sub group of traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage patients, the pooled odds ratio was 0.59 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.94). Three RCTs reported death and severe disability as an outcome in this subgroup, and the pooled odds ratio was 0.67 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.98).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials of calcium channel blockers in acute traumatic head injury patients shows that considerable uncertainty remains over their effects. The effect of nimodipine in a subgroup of brain injury patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage shows a beneficial effect, though the increase in adverse reactions suffered by the intervention group may mean that the drug is harmful for some patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app