Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the effect of multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the perioperative inflammatory response.

METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (A) on pump with conventional CPB and cardioplegic arrest, and (B) off pump on the beating heart. Serum samples were collected for estimation of neutrophil elastase, interleukin 8 (IL-8), C3a, and C5a preoperatively and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Furthermore, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and monocyte counts were carried out preoperatively and at 1, 12, 36 and 60 hours postoperatively. Overall incidence of infection and perioperative clinical outcome were also recorded.

RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of age, weight, gender ratio, extent of coronary disease, left ventricular function, and number of grafts per patient. Neutrophil elastase concentration peaked early after CPB in the on-pump group, with a decline with time. Repeated-measures analysis of variance between groups and comparisons at each time point (modified Bonferroni) showed elastase concentrations were significantly higher in the on-pump than the off-pump group (both p < 0.0001). IL-8 increased significantly after surgery in the on-pump group, with no decline during the observation period (p = 0.01 vs off pump). C3a and C5a rose early after surgery in both groups when compared with baseline values. Postoperative WBC, neutrophil, and monocyte counts were significantly higher in the on-pump than the off-pump group (p < 0.01). Finally, the incidence of postoperative overall infections was significantly higher in the on-pump group (p < 0.0001 vs off pump).

CONCLUSIONS: CABG on the beating heart is associated with a significant reduction in inflammatory response and postoperative infection when compared with conventional revascularization with CPB and cardioplegic arrest.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app