We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Uniport soft-tip, open-ended catheters versus multiport firm-tipped close-ended catheters for epidural labor analgesia: a quality assurance study.
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2000 March
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare a multiport, firm-tipped, close-ended, epidural catheter (Portex catheter) with a uniport, open-ended, soft-tipped, wire-reinforced catheter (Arrow catheter) in obstetric patients.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective data collection for intradepartmental quality assurance.
SETTING: Obstetric unit in a tertiary care maternity hospital.
PATIENTS: 2612 patients requesting labor analgesia.
INTERVENTIONS: The Arrow catheter was used in 1,352 women and the Portex catheter in 1,260 women.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of unsatisfactory block were 3.3% and 4.4% with the Arrow and Portex catheters, respectively (p = 0.2). The catheter perforated the dura matter in 0.4% of cases with both catheters. The incidence of epidural venipuncture was 1.1% with the Arrow catheter and 5.7% with the Portex catheter (p = 0.0001). Paresthesias occurred in 6% of cases with the Arrow catheter and 11. 2 % of cases with the Portex catheter (p = 0.0001). Epidural catheter reinsertion was required in fewer patients in the Arrow group than in the Portex group (4.8% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In obstetric patients, the softer uniport Arrow catheter produces paresthesias and venipunctures less frequently than the firm multiport Portex catheter.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective data collection for intradepartmental quality assurance.
SETTING: Obstetric unit in a tertiary care maternity hospital.
PATIENTS: 2612 patients requesting labor analgesia.
INTERVENTIONS: The Arrow catheter was used in 1,352 women and the Portex catheter in 1,260 women.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of unsatisfactory block were 3.3% and 4.4% with the Arrow and Portex catheters, respectively (p = 0.2). The catheter perforated the dura matter in 0.4% of cases with both catheters. The incidence of epidural venipuncture was 1.1% with the Arrow catheter and 5.7% with the Portex catheter (p = 0.0001). Paresthesias occurred in 6% of cases with the Arrow catheter and 11. 2 % of cases with the Portex catheter (p = 0.0001). Epidural catheter reinsertion was required in fewer patients in the Arrow group than in the Portex group (4.8% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In obstetric patients, the softer uniport Arrow catheter produces paresthesias and venipunctures less frequently than the firm multiport Portex catheter.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app