We have located links that may give you full text access.
CT angiography of thoracic outlet syndrome: evaluation of imaging protocols for the detection of arterial stenosis.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the results of cross-sectional imaging and multiplanar and 3D reconstructions for the detection of thoracic outlet arterial stenosis on CT angiograms.
METHOD: Eighty-two patients were prospectively evaluated with CT angiography: in the neutral position and after postural maneuver (164 acquisitions); with contralateral injection of a 24% (Group 1; n = 68) or 30% (Group 2; n = 96) contrast agent; and reconstruction of four sets of images from each acquisition, that is, transverse CT scans, sagittal reformations, and 3D [shaded surface displays (SSD) and volume-rendered (VR)] images. A total of 656 sets of images were blindly and independently interpreted by three readers of variable experience. A consensus interpretation of the four sets of images of each acquisition was used as a standard of reference.
RESULTS: The number of examinations coded with an excellent degree of arterial enhancement was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 [68 (71%) vs. 35 (51%); p < 0.001]. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of arterial stenosis were 67 and 96% for transverse CT scans, 69 and 94% for sagittal reformations, 71 and 99% for 3D-SSDs, and 95 and 100% for VR images. Compared with the standard of reference, a concordant scoring of arterial stenosis severity was found in 54% of transverse CT scans, 84% of sagittal reformations, 78% of 3D-SSDs, and 91% of VR images. Underestimation of stenosis was found in 43% of transverse CT scans and 10% of sagittal reformations; overestimation of stenosis was more frequent on 3D-SSDs (16%) than on VR images (7%). The reader's experience was marked for the interpretation of cross-sectional images but did not influence the interpretation of 3D images.
CONCLUSION: Thoracic outlet arterial compression is best depicted with the injection of a 30% contrast agent and reconstruction of VR images.
METHOD: Eighty-two patients were prospectively evaluated with CT angiography: in the neutral position and after postural maneuver (164 acquisitions); with contralateral injection of a 24% (Group 1; n = 68) or 30% (Group 2; n = 96) contrast agent; and reconstruction of four sets of images from each acquisition, that is, transverse CT scans, sagittal reformations, and 3D [shaded surface displays (SSD) and volume-rendered (VR)] images. A total of 656 sets of images were blindly and independently interpreted by three readers of variable experience. A consensus interpretation of the four sets of images of each acquisition was used as a standard of reference.
RESULTS: The number of examinations coded with an excellent degree of arterial enhancement was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 [68 (71%) vs. 35 (51%); p < 0.001]. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of arterial stenosis were 67 and 96% for transverse CT scans, 69 and 94% for sagittal reformations, 71 and 99% for 3D-SSDs, and 95 and 100% for VR images. Compared with the standard of reference, a concordant scoring of arterial stenosis severity was found in 54% of transverse CT scans, 84% of sagittal reformations, 78% of 3D-SSDs, and 91% of VR images. Underestimation of stenosis was found in 43% of transverse CT scans and 10% of sagittal reformations; overestimation of stenosis was more frequent on 3D-SSDs (16%) than on VR images (7%). The reader's experience was marked for the interpretation of cross-sectional images but did not influence the interpretation of 3D images.
CONCLUSION: Thoracic outlet arterial compression is best depicted with the injection of a 30% contrast agent and reconstruction of VR images.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app