Blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries: the role of screening computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Early generation scanners have demonstrated poor sensitivity detecting blunt bowel/mesenteric injuries (BBMI). This study was aimed at determining the accuracy and role of helical scanners in BBMI.

METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with BBMI, or computed tomographic scans suspicious of BBMI, from August of 1995 to December of 1998.

RESULTS: One hundred of 8,112 scans (1.2%) were suspicious of BBMI. Of these suspicious scans, 53 patients had BBMI (true positive-TP) and 47 patients did not (false positive-FP). Seven patients with negative scans had BBMI (false negative-FN). Computed tomography contributed toward early surgery in 77% of patients who may have been delayed. Six patients developed intra-abdominal abscess. The abscess group had a significantly longer time interval from injury to surgery. Multiple findings were seen in 57% of true positive scans, whereas in 13% of false positive scans (p < 0.0001). An algorithm for management of BBMI is presented.

CONCLUSION: Helical scanners have high accuracy in detecting BBMI. Single versus multiple findings are useful in managing these injuries.