We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
The relationship between facial fractures and death from neurologic injury.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review patients who failed to survive blunt trauma and to determine whether there is a relationship between specific facial fracture patterns and death.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective record review of patients with facial fractures admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1996. Records were reviewed for gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), revised probability of survival (RPS), cause of death, and facial fracture pattern. Facial fracture patterns were grouped as lower face (mandible), midface (maxilla, zygoma, nose, and orbits), and upper face (frontal bone). Causes of death were grouped into neurologic, visceral, combined neurologic and visceral, and other. Surviving and nonsurviving groups were compared. Parametric data were analyzed with a pooled or separate variance t-test, nonparametric data with a Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical variables with a chi-square test (P < or = .05). The odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals was used to show the association between facial fracture patterns and death.
RESULTS: During the 4-year period, 6,117 patients were admitted with blunt trauma, 661 (11%) of whom had facial fractures. Those who died were more likely to be older than those who survived, with a lower GCS, lower RPS, and higher ISS. Although there was a male predominance in the patient population, there was no gender difference between those who died and those who survived. Surviving patients were more likely to have only isolated mandible injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have isolated midface fractures or combinations of midface and other facial fractures. The odds ratio showed a 13 to 75 times greater risk of patients dying of neurologic injury with patterns other than isolated mandible injury than with any mid- or upper-facial fracture patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with survivors, nonsurviving patients with facial fractures were older and had a lower GCS, higher ISS, and lower RPS. Nonsurviving patients had a dramatic predilection for mid- and upper-facial fracture patterns and death of neurologic injury.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective record review of patients with facial fractures admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1996. Records were reviewed for gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), revised probability of survival (RPS), cause of death, and facial fracture pattern. Facial fracture patterns were grouped as lower face (mandible), midface (maxilla, zygoma, nose, and orbits), and upper face (frontal bone). Causes of death were grouped into neurologic, visceral, combined neurologic and visceral, and other. Surviving and nonsurviving groups were compared. Parametric data were analyzed with a pooled or separate variance t-test, nonparametric data with a Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical variables with a chi-square test (P < or = .05). The odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals was used to show the association between facial fracture patterns and death.
RESULTS: During the 4-year period, 6,117 patients were admitted with blunt trauma, 661 (11%) of whom had facial fractures. Those who died were more likely to be older than those who survived, with a lower GCS, lower RPS, and higher ISS. Although there was a male predominance in the patient population, there was no gender difference between those who died and those who survived. Surviving patients were more likely to have only isolated mandible injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have isolated midface fractures or combinations of midface and other facial fractures. The odds ratio showed a 13 to 75 times greater risk of patients dying of neurologic injury with patterns other than isolated mandible injury than with any mid- or upper-facial fracture patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with survivors, nonsurviving patients with facial fractures were older and had a lower GCS, higher ISS, and lower RPS. Nonsurviving patients had a dramatic predilection for mid- and upper-facial fracture patterns and death of neurologic injury.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app