We have located links that may give you full text access.
Fetal weight prediction by thigh volume measurement with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000 August
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of a simple method of predicting fetal weight by measuring fetal thigh volume with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
METHODS: In 84 pregnant women, fetuses without structural or chromosomal anomalies were studied prospectively and cross-sectionally. Biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. Fetal thigh volume was measured by three-dimensional ultrasound, using three cross-sectional images of femur, from proximal, middle, and distal parts of femur diaphysis. Infants were delivered within 48 hours after ultrasound examinations.
RESULTS: Modified thigh volume measurements using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound were correlated strongly with birth weight (R(2) = 0.921, P <.001). Using linear and polynomial regression, we calculated a new best-fit formula: Birth weight (g) = 165.32 + 28.78 x modified thigh volume (mL). The mean and standard deviation of the residual were 121.8 and 110.4, respectively, in three-dimensional formulas, which were significantly smaller than those of two-dimensional formulas.
CONCLUSION: Thigh volume measurement using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound was simple, and there was better accuracy with this method than with two-dimensional ultrasound methods for predicting fetal weight during the third trimester of pregnancy.
METHODS: In 84 pregnant women, fetuses without structural or chromosomal anomalies were studied prospectively and cross-sectionally. Biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were measured by two-dimensional ultrasound. Fetal thigh volume was measured by three-dimensional ultrasound, using three cross-sectional images of femur, from proximal, middle, and distal parts of femur diaphysis. Infants were delivered within 48 hours after ultrasound examinations.
RESULTS: Modified thigh volume measurements using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound were correlated strongly with birth weight (R(2) = 0.921, P <.001). Using linear and polynomial regression, we calculated a new best-fit formula: Birth weight (g) = 165.32 + 28.78 x modified thigh volume (mL). The mean and standard deviation of the residual were 121.8 and 110.4, respectively, in three-dimensional formulas, which were significantly smaller than those of two-dimensional formulas.
CONCLUSION: Thigh volume measurement using three cross-sectional images of femur by three-dimensional ultrasound was simple, and there was better accuracy with this method than with two-dimensional ultrasound methods for predicting fetal weight during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app