We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999 May
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of transcervical resection of submucous myomas and to identify prognostic factors for long-term results.
METHODS: Two-hundred eighty-five women were treated with transcervical resection of submucous myomas without endometrial ablation. In case of incomplete resection a repeat procedure was offered. Long-term follow-up was obtained. Recurrence was defined as the need for further surgery. The relation of several variables with the outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: Seventeen cases (6%) were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 1-104 months); for cases without recurrence median follow-up was 42 months (range 16-104 months). Forty-one (14.5%) patients had repeat surgery. An independent prognostic value of uterine size (P < .001) and number of submucous myomas (P < .001) for recurrence was noted. Twenty of 41 patients who had repeat surgery subsequently had a hysterectomy. None of the variables investigated predicted the need for hysterectomy. The surgery-free percentage of 165 patients with normal sized uteri and not more than two myomas was 94.3% (standard error +/- 1.8%) at 2 years and 90.3% (+/- 3.0%) at 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Transcervical resection of submucous myomas is a safe and effective treatment for patients with a normal sized uterus and not more than two myomas. It is an acceptable alternative for selected other patients. The need for a combined endometrial ablation is questionable. Transcervical resection of submucous myomas will give patients a high chance of averting further surgery and should modify the way patients are counseled.
METHODS: Two-hundred eighty-five women were treated with transcervical resection of submucous myomas without endometrial ablation. In case of incomplete resection a repeat procedure was offered. Long-term follow-up was obtained. Recurrence was defined as the need for further surgery. The relation of several variables with the outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: Seventeen cases (6%) were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 46 months (range 1-104 months); for cases without recurrence median follow-up was 42 months (range 16-104 months). Forty-one (14.5%) patients had repeat surgery. An independent prognostic value of uterine size (P < .001) and number of submucous myomas (P < .001) for recurrence was noted. Twenty of 41 patients who had repeat surgery subsequently had a hysterectomy. None of the variables investigated predicted the need for hysterectomy. The surgery-free percentage of 165 patients with normal sized uteri and not more than two myomas was 94.3% (standard error +/- 1.8%) at 2 years and 90.3% (+/- 3.0%) at 5 years.
CONCLUSION: Transcervical resection of submucous myomas is a safe and effective treatment for patients with a normal sized uterus and not more than two myomas. It is an acceptable alternative for selected other patients. The need for a combined endometrial ablation is questionable. Transcervical resection of submucous myomas will give patients a high chance of averting further surgery and should modify the way patients are counseled.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app