We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Cardiac troponin I as diagnostic and prognostic marker in severe heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac cell death has been shown to occur in heart failure and has been implicated as one of the mechanisms responsible for progression of the disease. Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) represents a highly sensitive marker for myocardial cell death. Based on previous studies reporting that cTnI may be detected in patients with heart failure, we evaluated the clinical correlates and prognostic implications of detectable cTnI in a consecutive series of patients with severe heart failure.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients were examined. Upon admission, we measured serum levels of cTnI by conventional immunoenzymatic assay (Stratus Dade II). According to the results of this assay, patients were divided into 2 groups, based on the presence (cTnI+) or absence (cTnI-) of detectable cTnI. These 2 groups were compared by non-parametric analysis for their clinical characteristics, instrumental findings, and short-term outcome.
RESULTS: The cTnI+ group included 10 patients (29%) with a mean serum cTnI of 0.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml. Compared with the cTnI- group, these patients had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fractions (20% +/- 5% vs 26% +/- 7%, p = 0.023) and a trend for higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (59 +/- 17 mm Hg vs 49 +/- 13 mm Hg, p = 0.08). In cTnI+ patients, the correlation between cTnI levels upon admission and ejection fraction was r = -0.530 (p = 0.11). We found ischemic etiology was equally present in the 2 groups, whereas we never found histologic signs of acute myocarditis. Other clinical characteristics (functional class, daily diuretic dose, need for intravenous inotropes) were not statistically different in the 2 groups. In cTnI+ patients who improved after admission, cTnI became undetectable after a few days; in patients with refractory heart failure who were hospitalized until death, cTnI persisted in detectable levels throughout the observation period. Using the Cox proportional hazard model, a positive cTnI was the most powerful predictor of mortality at 3 months (p = 0.013; hazard ratio 6.86; 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 35.4).
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that cTnI is detected in the blood of 25% to 33% of patients with severe heart failure; its presence may help to identify a high-risk sub-group who faces very poor short-term prognosis.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients were examined. Upon admission, we measured serum levels of cTnI by conventional immunoenzymatic assay (Stratus Dade II). According to the results of this assay, patients were divided into 2 groups, based on the presence (cTnI+) or absence (cTnI-) of detectable cTnI. These 2 groups were compared by non-parametric analysis for their clinical characteristics, instrumental findings, and short-term outcome.
RESULTS: The cTnI+ group included 10 patients (29%) with a mean serum cTnI of 0.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml. Compared with the cTnI- group, these patients had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fractions (20% +/- 5% vs 26% +/- 7%, p = 0.023) and a trend for higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (59 +/- 17 mm Hg vs 49 +/- 13 mm Hg, p = 0.08). In cTnI+ patients, the correlation between cTnI levels upon admission and ejection fraction was r = -0.530 (p = 0.11). We found ischemic etiology was equally present in the 2 groups, whereas we never found histologic signs of acute myocarditis. Other clinical characteristics (functional class, daily diuretic dose, need for intravenous inotropes) were not statistically different in the 2 groups. In cTnI+ patients who improved after admission, cTnI became undetectable after a few days; in patients with refractory heart failure who were hospitalized until death, cTnI persisted in detectable levels throughout the observation period. Using the Cox proportional hazard model, a positive cTnI was the most powerful predictor of mortality at 3 months (p = 0.013; hazard ratio 6.86; 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 35.4).
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that cTnI is detected in the blood of 25% to 33% of patients with severe heart failure; its presence may help to identify a high-risk sub-group who faces very poor short-term prognosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app