We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
A randomized controlled trial of strapping to prevent post-stroke shoulder pain.
Clinical Rehabilitation 2000 August
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether strapping the shoulder in hemiplegic stroke patients: (1) prevents the development, or reduces the severity, of shoulder pain, (2) preserves range of movement in the shoulder, and (3) improves the functional outcomes for the arm and patient overall.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial of shoulder strapping versus no strapping.
SETTING: Care of the elderly wards in a teaching hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with an acute hemiplegic stroke, who had persisting weakness of shoulder abduction.
INTERVENTION: The treatment group had their affected shoulder strapped for six weeks from randomization in addition to standard physiotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All subjects were assessed at entry (week 0), at end of the treatment phase (week 6) and two months later (week 14). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess shoulder pain severity whereas shoulder range of movement to the point of pain (SROMP) assessed passive range of movement and pain. Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) and Rankin Disability Index measured functional outcomes.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects participated (49 strapped, 49 controls). Intention to treat analysis showed no significant difference in pain, range of movement or functional outcomes after the intervention phase or at the final assessment. However there were trends for less pain at six weeks (VAS, p = 0.11) and better final upper limb function (MAS, p = 0.16) in strapped patients. Skin reactions were uncommon (6.1%). The presence of neglect or sensory loss, but not subluxation, at baseline was independently associated with poor outcome. Range of movement was lost early (mean difference SROMP between hemiplegic and contralateral shoulders at baseline = 15.2 degrees (95% CI 10.9-19.5)) and continued throughout the study. Shoulder strapping did not alter the rate at which range of movement was lost.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant benefit with shoulder strapping was demonstrated and reasons for this are discussed. Range of movement in the hemiplegic shoulder is lost very early and any preventive treatments need to begin within the first 1-2 days after a stroke.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial of shoulder strapping versus no strapping.
SETTING: Care of the elderly wards in a teaching hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with an acute hemiplegic stroke, who had persisting weakness of shoulder abduction.
INTERVENTION: The treatment group had their affected shoulder strapped for six weeks from randomization in addition to standard physiotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All subjects were assessed at entry (week 0), at end of the treatment phase (week 6) and two months later (week 14). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess shoulder pain severity whereas shoulder range of movement to the point of pain (SROMP) assessed passive range of movement and pain. Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) and Rankin Disability Index measured functional outcomes.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects participated (49 strapped, 49 controls). Intention to treat analysis showed no significant difference in pain, range of movement or functional outcomes after the intervention phase or at the final assessment. However there were trends for less pain at six weeks (VAS, p = 0.11) and better final upper limb function (MAS, p = 0.16) in strapped patients. Skin reactions were uncommon (6.1%). The presence of neglect or sensory loss, but not subluxation, at baseline was independently associated with poor outcome. Range of movement was lost early (mean difference SROMP between hemiplegic and contralateral shoulders at baseline = 15.2 degrees (95% CI 10.9-19.5)) and continued throughout the study. Shoulder strapping did not alter the rate at which range of movement was lost.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant benefit with shoulder strapping was demonstrated and reasons for this are discussed. Range of movement in the hemiplegic shoulder is lost very early and any preventive treatments need to begin within the first 1-2 days after a stroke.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app