We have located links that may give you full text access.
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in the evaluation of disease activity and severity in polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective follow-up study.
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2000 August
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and clinical features of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at diagnosis or during relapse/recurrence. To evaluate the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR in the assessment of PMR activity.
METHODS: A prospective follow-up study on 177 consecutive patients meeting the criteria for PMR diagnosed over a 5-year period was conducted in two Italian secondary referral centers of rheumatology. At diagnosis and during follow-up, ESR (Westergren method) and CRP (nephelometry) were measured in all patients. Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations was performed on 78 PMR patients at diagnosis. A two-color technique using the association of specific monoclonal antibodies was applied. A control group consisting of 18 healthy adults older than 60 years was matched for age and sex with the PMR patients.
RESULTS: Ten of 177 (6%) patients had normal ESR values at diagnosis (< or = 30 mm/h). Patients with normal ESR were predominantly men and had lower CRP levels; systemic signs and symptoms were more frequent in patients with higher ESR. The percentages of circulating CD8+ cells were similar in the two groups. CRP values at diagnosis were normal in only 2 of 177 (1%) patients. CRP values were elevated in 9 of 10 patients with normal ESR at diagnosis. Twenty-five episodes of relapse/recurrence with normal ESR occurred in 17 patients. CRP was high in 62% of these episodes. Results of univariate analysis indicated that the 10th percentile for ESR (40 mm/h) and the 70th percentile for CRP (7.8 mg/dL) values at diagnosis were the best cutoff points that discriminate between patients with and without relapse/recurrence. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that ESR greater than 40 mm/h and CRP greater than 7.8 mg/dL at diagnosis were the two variables that independently increased the risk of relapse/recurrence. However, the relative risk related to ESR was twice than that related to CRP (4.9 vs 2.1).
CONCLUSION: PMR with a normal ESR at diagnosis was infrequent in our study compared with previous studies. ESR was a superior predictor of relapse than CRP. However, CRP was a more sensitive indicator of current disease activity.
METHODS: A prospective follow-up study on 177 consecutive patients meeting the criteria for PMR diagnosed over a 5-year period was conducted in two Italian secondary referral centers of rheumatology. At diagnosis and during follow-up, ESR (Westergren method) and CRP (nephelometry) were measured in all patients. Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations was performed on 78 PMR patients at diagnosis. A two-color technique using the association of specific monoclonal antibodies was applied. A control group consisting of 18 healthy adults older than 60 years was matched for age and sex with the PMR patients.
RESULTS: Ten of 177 (6%) patients had normal ESR values at diagnosis (< or = 30 mm/h). Patients with normal ESR were predominantly men and had lower CRP levels; systemic signs and symptoms were more frequent in patients with higher ESR. The percentages of circulating CD8+ cells were similar in the two groups. CRP values at diagnosis were normal in only 2 of 177 (1%) patients. CRP values were elevated in 9 of 10 patients with normal ESR at diagnosis. Twenty-five episodes of relapse/recurrence with normal ESR occurred in 17 patients. CRP was high in 62% of these episodes. Results of univariate analysis indicated that the 10th percentile for ESR (40 mm/h) and the 70th percentile for CRP (7.8 mg/dL) values at diagnosis were the best cutoff points that discriminate between patients with and without relapse/recurrence. Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that ESR greater than 40 mm/h and CRP greater than 7.8 mg/dL at diagnosis were the two variables that independently increased the risk of relapse/recurrence. However, the relative risk related to ESR was twice than that related to CRP (4.9 vs 2.1).
CONCLUSION: PMR with a normal ESR at diagnosis was infrequent in our study compared with previous studies. ESR was a superior predictor of relapse than CRP. However, CRP was a more sensitive indicator of current disease activity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app