We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Disability measurement in persons with back pain: a validity study of spinal range of motion and velocity.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000 October
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the criterion validity and responsiveness to change of spine kinematic variables to assess disability in patients with low back pain.
DESIGN: Blinded comparison between spine kinematic variables, Oswestry disability questionnaire scores, and work status.
SETTING: Multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation clinic of a university hospital.
PATIENTS: Population-based cohort of 111 patients with subacute work-related back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks because of back pain.
INTERVENTIONS: This study was part of a population-based randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to 4 different methods of management: usual care, rehabilitation, ergonomics, or rehabilitation and ergonomics.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry disability questionnaire, kinematic analysis of the spine during flexion and extension of the trunk, and work status were collected at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52 after the back accident.
RESULTS: Kinematic variables were poorly to moderately related to work status and Oswestry questionnaire scores. Kinematic variables were also unresponsive to change in work status and Oswestry questionnaire scores over time.
CONCLUSION: Spine kinematics during flexion and extension of the trunk do not appear to be a valid measure of disability in patients with subacute and chronic back pain.
DESIGN: Blinded comparison between spine kinematic variables, Oswestry disability questionnaire scores, and work status.
SETTING: Multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation clinic of a university hospital.
PATIENTS: Population-based cohort of 111 patients with subacute work-related back pain who were absent from regular work for more than 4 weeks because of back pain.
INTERVENTIONS: This study was part of a population-based randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to 4 different methods of management: usual care, rehabilitation, ergonomics, or rehabilitation and ergonomics.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oswestry disability questionnaire, kinematic analysis of the spine during flexion and extension of the trunk, and work status were collected at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52 after the back accident.
RESULTS: Kinematic variables were poorly to moderately related to work status and Oswestry questionnaire scores. Kinematic variables were also unresponsive to change in work status and Oswestry questionnaire scores over time.
CONCLUSION: Spine kinematics during flexion and extension of the trunk do not appear to be a valid measure of disability in patients with subacute and chronic back pain.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app