We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
TECHNICAL REPORT
Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One advantage of minimal-access surgery is that it produces less pain. A radially expanding trocar has been claimed to reduce pain further. We aimed to evaluate this claim.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Fifty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, between July 1997 and September 1998 were randomized into either the study group or the control group. The radially expanding 10-mm trocar was used for the epigastric port in the study group. The conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used similarly in the control group. The operation was otherwise performed with a standardized technique. Another conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used for the subumbilical port for all patients. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale. Pain scores for the epigastric port and subumbilical port were documented for 3 days after the surgery.
RESULTS: There was no difference in age, sex, diagnoses, operating time, or conversion rate. There was consistently no difference in the pain experienced in the subumbilical wound, whereas pain at the epigastric wound was consistently less with the radially expanding trocar (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The radially expanding trocar produces less early postoperative pain than the conventional metal trocar.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Fifty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, between July 1997 and September 1998 were randomized into either the study group or the control group. The radially expanding 10-mm trocar was used for the epigastric port in the study group. The conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used similarly in the control group. The operation was otherwise performed with a standardized technique. Another conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used for the subumbilical port for all patients. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale. Pain scores for the epigastric port and subumbilical port were documented for 3 days after the surgery.
RESULTS: There was no difference in age, sex, diagnoses, operating time, or conversion rate. There was consistently no difference in the pain experienced in the subumbilical wound, whereas pain at the epigastric wound was consistently less with the radially expanding trocar (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The radially expanding trocar produces less early postoperative pain than the conventional metal trocar.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app