We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Ultrasound-guided strategy for provisional stenting with focal balloon combination catheter: results from the randomized Strategy for Intracoronary Ultrasound-guided PTCA and Stenting (SIPS) trial.
Circulation 2000 November 15
BACKGROUND: Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) has provided insights into vascular pathology and interventional therapy. The Strategy for ICUS-Guided PTCA and Stenting (SIPS) trial tested the hypothesis that routine ICUS guidance of coronary interventions improves outcome.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center consecutive-patient randomized design (with 6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up) was used. Consecutive patients (no chronic total occlusions or emergency procedures) were randomized to ICUS-guided provisional stenting or standard angiographic guidance. Quantitative angiographic minimal lumen diameter (MLD), angiographic restenosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were evaluated. A total of 291 procedures (356 lesions) were included. Procedure success was higher in the ICUS-guided group than the group randomized to standard guidance (94. 7% versus 87.4%, respectively; P:=0.033), whereas time (65.2+/-31.0 versus 60.5+/-34.0 minutes, P:=0.18) and contrast use (209.3+/-94.1 versus 197.5+/-89.5 mL, P:=0.23) were not significantly different. Stenting rates were similar (49.7% versus 49.5%, P:=0.89). Acute gain was greater in the ICUS-guided group than in the standard guidance group (1.85+/-0.72 versus 1.67+/-0.76 mm, respectively; P:=0.02). Angiographic 6-month analysis revealed no difference in MLD (1.71+/-0.94 versus 1.57+/-0.90, P:=0.19) or binary restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) (29% versus 35%, P:=0.42). Clinical follow-up (602+/-307 days) showed a significant decrease in clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the ICUS group compared with the standard guidance group (17% versus 29%, respectively; P:=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Although angiographic MLD did not differ significantly after 6 months, ICUS-guided provisional stenting improved 2-year clinical results after intervention.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center consecutive-patient randomized design (with 6-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up) was used. Consecutive patients (no chronic total occlusions or emergency procedures) were randomized to ICUS-guided provisional stenting or standard angiographic guidance. Quantitative angiographic minimal lumen diameter (MLD), angiographic restenosis, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were evaluated. A total of 291 procedures (356 lesions) were included. Procedure success was higher in the ICUS-guided group than the group randomized to standard guidance (94. 7% versus 87.4%, respectively; P:=0.033), whereas time (65.2+/-31.0 versus 60.5+/-34.0 minutes, P:=0.18) and contrast use (209.3+/-94.1 versus 197.5+/-89.5 mL, P:=0.23) were not significantly different. Stenting rates were similar (49.7% versus 49.5%, P:=0.89). Acute gain was greater in the ICUS-guided group than in the standard guidance group (1.85+/-0.72 versus 1.67+/-0.76 mm, respectively; P:=0.02). Angiographic 6-month analysis revealed no difference in MLD (1.71+/-0.94 versus 1.57+/-0.90, P:=0.19) or binary restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis) (29% versus 35%, P:=0.42). Clinical follow-up (602+/-307 days) showed a significant decrease in clinically driven target lesion revascularization in the ICUS group compared with the standard guidance group (17% versus 29%, respectively; P:=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Although angiographic MLD did not differ significantly after 6 months, ICUS-guided provisional stenting improved 2-year clinical results after intervention.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app