We have located links that may give you full text access.
The importance of diagnostic accuracy in colonic inflammatory bowel disease.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 2000 November
OBJECTIVE: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) may both affect the colon. However, in approximately 10-20% of these cases, it is impossible to distinguish between these two entities either clinically or histologically, and a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis (IC) is made. Correct diagnosis is important because surgical treatment and long-term prognosis differ for UC and CD. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of interobserver agreement among board-certified pathologists and a specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist regarding the histological diagnosis of colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: A total of 24 university medical center pathologists from eight institutions evaluated 84 colectomy specimens and 35 sets of biopsy specimens from 119 consecutive patients with colonic IBD. A specialist GI pathologist subsequently reviewed all cases without knowledge of clinical data and prior diagnosis.
RESULTS: The GI pathologist's diagnoses differed from the initial diagnoses in 45% of surgical specimens and 54% of biopsy specimens. Of 70 cases initially diagnosed as UC, 30 (43%) were changed to CD or IC, whereas 4 of 23 cases (17%) initially diagnosed as CD were changed to UC or IC. The kappa coefficient for the overall agreement of initial diagnoses with the specialist GI pathologist's diagnoses was -0.01 (p = 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interobserver variation in the histological diagnosis of colonic IBD. This may have a profound effect on clinical patient care and, especially, on the choice of operation. More accurate diagnostic criteria are needed to facilitate patient care and to optimize treatment outcome.
METHODS: A total of 24 university medical center pathologists from eight institutions evaluated 84 colectomy specimens and 35 sets of biopsy specimens from 119 consecutive patients with colonic IBD. A specialist GI pathologist subsequently reviewed all cases without knowledge of clinical data and prior diagnosis.
RESULTS: The GI pathologist's diagnoses differed from the initial diagnoses in 45% of surgical specimens and 54% of biopsy specimens. Of 70 cases initially diagnosed as UC, 30 (43%) were changed to CD or IC, whereas 4 of 23 cases (17%) initially diagnosed as CD were changed to UC or IC. The kappa coefficient for the overall agreement of initial diagnoses with the specialist GI pathologist's diagnoses was -0.01 (p = 0.98).
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interobserver variation in the histological diagnosis of colonic IBD. This may have a profound effect on clinical patient care and, especially, on the choice of operation. More accurate diagnostic criteria are needed to facilitate patient care and to optimize treatment outcome.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app