We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) for treatment of migraine headaches: an open-label study.
Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2000 December
OBJECTIVE: The object of this clinical experience was to evaluate the correlation between pericranial botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX, Allergan Corp, Irvine, CA) administration and alleviation of migraine headache symptoms.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A nonrandomized, open-label study was performed at 4 different test sites. The subjects consisted of 106 patients, predominantly female, who either (1) initially sought BOTOX treatment for hyperfunctional facial lines or other dystonias with concomitant headache disorders, or (2) were candidates for BOTOX treatment specifically for headaches. Headaches were classified as true migraine, possible migraine, or nonmigraine, based on baseline headache characteristics and International Headache Society criteria. BOTOX was injected into the glabellar, temporal, frontal, and/or suboccipital regions of the head and neck. Main outcome measures were determined by severity and duration of response. The degrees of response were classified as: (1) complete (symptom elimination), (2) partial > or =50% reduction in headache frequency or severity), and (3) no response [neither (1) nor (2)]. Duration of response was measured in months for the prophylactic group.
RESULTS: Among 77 true migraine subjects treated prophylactically, 51% (95% confidence interval, 39% to 62%) reported complete response with a mean (SD) response duration of 4.1 (2.6) months; 38% reported partial response with a mean (SD) response duration of 2.7 (1.2) months. Overall improvement was independent of baseline headache characteristics. Seventy percent (95% confidence interval, 35% to 93%) of 10 true migraine patients treated acutely reported complete response with improvement 1 to 2 hours after treatment. No adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: BOTOX was found to be a safe and effective therapy for both acute and prophylactic treatment of migraine headaches. Further research is needed to explore and develop the complete potential for the neuroinhibitory effects of botulinum toxin.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A nonrandomized, open-label study was performed at 4 different test sites. The subjects consisted of 106 patients, predominantly female, who either (1) initially sought BOTOX treatment for hyperfunctional facial lines or other dystonias with concomitant headache disorders, or (2) were candidates for BOTOX treatment specifically for headaches. Headaches were classified as true migraine, possible migraine, or nonmigraine, based on baseline headache characteristics and International Headache Society criteria. BOTOX was injected into the glabellar, temporal, frontal, and/or suboccipital regions of the head and neck. Main outcome measures were determined by severity and duration of response. The degrees of response were classified as: (1) complete (symptom elimination), (2) partial > or =50% reduction in headache frequency or severity), and (3) no response [neither (1) nor (2)]. Duration of response was measured in months for the prophylactic group.
RESULTS: Among 77 true migraine subjects treated prophylactically, 51% (95% confidence interval, 39% to 62%) reported complete response with a mean (SD) response duration of 4.1 (2.6) months; 38% reported partial response with a mean (SD) response duration of 2.7 (1.2) months. Overall improvement was independent of baseline headache characteristics. Seventy percent (95% confidence interval, 35% to 93%) of 10 true migraine patients treated acutely reported complete response with improvement 1 to 2 hours after treatment. No adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: BOTOX was found to be a safe and effective therapy for both acute and prophylactic treatment of migraine headaches. Further research is needed to explore and develop the complete potential for the neuroinhibitory effects of botulinum toxin.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app