We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Multicenter ProstaScint imaging findings in 2154 patients with prostate cancer. The ProstaScint Imaging Centers.
Urology 2000 December 21
OBJECTIVES: To report the results of a retrospective study of 2290 ProstaScint scans of 2154 patients with prostate carcinoma done at 15 institutions.
METHODS: The results were analyzed by logistic regression after stratification of the patients into four groups: group 1, newly diagnosed; group 2, after radical prostatectomy with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level; group 3, after radiation therapy with a rising PSA level; and group 4, after hormonal therapy.
RESULTS: The PSA level and ProstaScint scans positive in the prostate bed (P <0.001) and for pelvic metastases (P <0.001), but not for extrapelvic metastases, correlated significantly in group 1 patients. In group 2, the association for detecting fossa recurrence was weaker (P = 0.033) and was insignificant for pelvic and extrapelvic metastases. Patients in group 3 also exhibited a weak PSA-ProstaScint association for detecting fossa recurrence (P = 0.038), and was insignificant for pelvic and extrapelvic metastases. No significant PSA-ProstaScint correlation was found in patients in group 4 for fossa recurrence, pelvic or extrapelvic metastases. The distribution of positive ProstaScint results among the prostate/prostate bed, pelvic nodes, and extrapelvic nodes was nearly equal for all groups, except that a significantly greater percentage of extrapelvic metastases was found in the hormonal group (group 4). The ProstaScint results were independent of the Gleason score for 260 patients before and 285 patients after therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the complementary diagnostic value of ProstaScint to PSA level and Gleason score as an independent indicator of prostate cancer recurrence and metastases and in identifying extrapelvic metastases in both newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer.
METHODS: The results were analyzed by logistic regression after stratification of the patients into four groups: group 1, newly diagnosed; group 2, after radical prostatectomy with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level; group 3, after radiation therapy with a rising PSA level; and group 4, after hormonal therapy.
RESULTS: The PSA level and ProstaScint scans positive in the prostate bed (P <0.001) and for pelvic metastases (P <0.001), but not for extrapelvic metastases, correlated significantly in group 1 patients. In group 2, the association for detecting fossa recurrence was weaker (P = 0.033) and was insignificant for pelvic and extrapelvic metastases. Patients in group 3 also exhibited a weak PSA-ProstaScint association for detecting fossa recurrence (P = 0.038), and was insignificant for pelvic and extrapelvic metastases. No significant PSA-ProstaScint correlation was found in patients in group 4 for fossa recurrence, pelvic or extrapelvic metastases. The distribution of positive ProstaScint results among the prostate/prostate bed, pelvic nodes, and extrapelvic nodes was nearly equal for all groups, except that a significantly greater percentage of extrapelvic metastases was found in the hormonal group (group 4). The ProstaScint results were independent of the Gleason score for 260 patients before and 285 patients after therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the complementary diagnostic value of ProstaScint to PSA level and Gleason score as an independent indicator of prostate cancer recurrence and metastases and in identifying extrapelvic metastases in both newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app