We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Risk factors for delayed healing of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: a pooled analysis.
Archives of Dermatology 2000 December
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of various risk factors on the probability that neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers will heal within 20 weeks of care.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A pooled or meta-analysis of individual patient data from the standard care arms of 5 randomized clinical trials was conducted. We analyzed 586 subjects with diabetes mellitus who had a neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer. All patients received good wound care, debridement, and "off-loading" of the wound.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the magnitude of the association of each risk factor with patients having healed wounds.
RESULTS: Logistic regression odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) revealed that those patients with a diabetic neuropathic foot ulcer that healed within 20 weeks using standard care were more likely to have a smaller wound (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81), a wound that existed for a shorter period (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.87), and be nonwhite (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96) compared with patients whose wounds did not heal within 20 weeks. The patient's age (OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.01), serum level of glycosylated hemoglobin at the start of the study (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10), and sex (OR = 1. 02; 95% CI, 0.69-1.50) were unassociated with the probability of wound healing. Substantial heterogeneity was not found among the studies.
CONCLUSIONS: A standard care regimen for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers is most likely to be effective for patients who have wounds that are small and of brief duration. This information should help dermatologists decide initially whether to use standard care, to try a new treatment, or to refer the patient to a specialty center.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A pooled or meta-analysis of individual patient data from the standard care arms of 5 randomized clinical trials was conducted. We analyzed 586 subjects with diabetes mellitus who had a neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer. All patients received good wound care, debridement, and "off-loading" of the wound.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the magnitude of the association of each risk factor with patients having healed wounds.
RESULTS: Logistic regression odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]) revealed that those patients with a diabetic neuropathic foot ulcer that healed within 20 weeks using standard care were more likely to have a smaller wound (OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.81), a wound that existed for a shorter period (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.87), and be nonwhite (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96) compared with patients whose wounds did not heal within 20 weeks. The patient's age (OR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.01), serum level of glycosylated hemoglobin at the start of the study (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10), and sex (OR = 1. 02; 95% CI, 0.69-1.50) were unassociated with the probability of wound healing. Substantial heterogeneity was not found among the studies.
CONCLUSIONS: A standard care regimen for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers is most likely to be effective for patients who have wounds that are small and of brief duration. This information should help dermatologists decide initially whether to use standard care, to try a new treatment, or to refer the patient to a specialty center.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app