We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Erbium: YAG versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy.
Journal of Urology 2001 March
PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) lithotripsy is more efficient than holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human calculi composed of greater than 97% calcium oxalate monohydrate and cystine were studied. Calculi were irradiated in water using Er:YAG or Ho:YAG lasers. Er:YAG lithotripsy was done with a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Ho:YAG lithotripsy was performed with a 365 microm low hydroxy optical fiber at a pulse energy of 500 mJ at 10 Hz or a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Fragmentation was defined as the initial stone mass minus the final dominant fragment mass and normalized for incident laser fluence (energy per unit area of fiber tip).
RESULTS: Mean fragmentation plus or minus standard deviation for calcium oxalate monohydrate was 38 +/- 27 mg for Er:YAG and 22 +/- 6 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) versus 5 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.001). When fragmentation was normalized for incident laser fluence given different optical fiber sizes, mean fragmentation efficiency was 53.6 +/- 38.7 g-microm2/J for Er:YAG lithotripsy compared with 22.6 +/- 6.4 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) lithotripsy (p = 0.04). Mean cystine fragmentation was 15 +/- 3 mg for Er:YAG versus 9 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Er:YAG lithotripsy is more efficient than Ho:YAG lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human calculi composed of greater than 97% calcium oxalate monohydrate and cystine were studied. Calculi were irradiated in water using Er:YAG or Ho:YAG lasers. Er:YAG lithotripsy was done with a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Ho:YAG lithotripsy was performed with a 365 microm low hydroxy optical fiber at a pulse energy of 500 mJ at 10 Hz or a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Fragmentation was defined as the initial stone mass minus the final dominant fragment mass and normalized for incident laser fluence (energy per unit area of fiber tip).
RESULTS: Mean fragmentation plus or minus standard deviation for calcium oxalate monohydrate was 38 +/- 27 mg for Er:YAG and 22 +/- 6 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) versus 5 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.001). When fragmentation was normalized for incident laser fluence given different optical fiber sizes, mean fragmentation efficiency was 53.6 +/- 38.7 g-microm2/J for Er:YAG lithotripsy compared with 22.6 +/- 6.4 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) lithotripsy (p = 0.04). Mean cystine fragmentation was 15 +/- 3 mg for Er:YAG versus 9 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Er:YAG lithotripsy is more efficient than Ho:YAG lithotripsy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app