We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Validation Studies
Preoperative assessment of hand circulation by means of Doppler ultrasonography and the modified Allen test.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate Doppler ultrasonography in assessing hand collateral circulation; (2) to define the criteria for an abnormal Doppler ultrasonography dynamic test result; and (3) to validate the modified Allen test.
METHODS: The hand circulation of 71 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting was assessed by means of the Allen test and Doppler ultrasonography. The flow in the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery with and without radial artery compression were recorded. Flow patterns in the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery with radial artery compression were categorized into 4 groups: (1) no flow; (2) decreased flow; (3) reversed flow; and (4) increased flow.
RESULTS: Among the 71 hands, 4 (5.6%) had an abnormal Allen test result (>10 seconds). Seven (10.6%) of 66 superficial palmar branches of the radial artery, 3 (4.2%) of 71 ulnar arteries, and 2 (2.8%) of 71 dorsal digital thumb arteries showed no flow with radial artery compression, as measured by Doppler ultrasonography. There were significant differences among the 4 groups (superficial palmar branch of the radial artery: F = 7.0, P <.001; ulnar artery: F = 13.1, P <.001; and dorsal digital thumb artery: F = 8.4, P <.001) for the Allen test. Pairwise comparisons showed that when subjected to an Allen test, category 1 patients (no flow) had significantly longer recovery times compared with the other groups (P <.02 in all cases) for the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery.
CONCLUSION: Absence of flow in the dorsal digital thumb artery with radial artery compression is considered an absolute contraindication to radial artery harvesting. An increased recovery time with the modified Allen test predicts absence of flow in the dorsal digital thumb artery in Doppler ultrasonographic flow patterns. This demonstrates the validity of the modified Allen test for primary screening.
METHODS: The hand circulation of 71 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting was assessed by means of the Allen test and Doppler ultrasonography. The flow in the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery with and without radial artery compression were recorded. Flow patterns in the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery with radial artery compression were categorized into 4 groups: (1) no flow; (2) decreased flow; (3) reversed flow; and (4) increased flow.
RESULTS: Among the 71 hands, 4 (5.6%) had an abnormal Allen test result (>10 seconds). Seven (10.6%) of 66 superficial palmar branches of the radial artery, 3 (4.2%) of 71 ulnar arteries, and 2 (2.8%) of 71 dorsal digital thumb arteries showed no flow with radial artery compression, as measured by Doppler ultrasonography. There were significant differences among the 4 groups (superficial palmar branch of the radial artery: F = 7.0, P <.001; ulnar artery: F = 13.1, P <.001; and dorsal digital thumb artery: F = 8.4, P <.001) for the Allen test. Pairwise comparisons showed that when subjected to an Allen test, category 1 patients (no flow) had significantly longer recovery times compared with the other groups (P <.02 in all cases) for the superficial palmar branch of the radial artery, the ulnar artery, and the dorsal digital thumb artery.
CONCLUSION: Absence of flow in the dorsal digital thumb artery with radial artery compression is considered an absolute contraindication to radial artery harvesting. An increased recovery time with the modified Allen test predicts absence of flow in the dorsal digital thumb artery in Doppler ultrasonographic flow patterns. This demonstrates the validity of the modified Allen test for primary screening.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app