We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Twin Study
Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries.
Fertility and Sterility 2001 April
OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetrical outcome of twin pregnancies after assisted reproduction with that of natural twin pregnancies.
DESIGN: Retrospective national database study.
SETTING: Academic Medical Centre.
PATIENT(S): One thousand ninety-three primiparous mothers registered in the Dutch National Birth Registry who gave birth to a dizygotic (DZ) twin (male/female) in 1994, 1995, and 1996. We compared 613 natural twin pregnancies and 480 twin pregnancies born after assisted reproduction.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gestational length, mode of delivery, mode of presentation of the children, birth weight, APGAR score, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality rate, highest recorded maternal diastolic blood pressure, and maternal postpartum complications.
RESULT(S): Rates of perinatal mortality and very premature parturition (<29 weeks) were lower in natural twin mothers. Overall, induced DZ twins were born 3.5 days earlier with a lower birth weight and APGAR score compared with controls. Rates of congenital anomalies and incidence of cesarean section were not different. The highest recorded diastolic blood pressure was lower in induced twinning with a 30% lower incidence of diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg.
CONCLUSION(S): Obstetric outcome for induced DZ twin pregnancy is less optimal than in natural DZ twin pregnancy. Twinning in assisted reproduction is known for its contribution to the high rate of premature deliveries, but in addition being a subfertile patient undergoing treatment makes an intrinsic contribution to adverse events as well.
DESIGN: Retrospective national database study.
SETTING: Academic Medical Centre.
PATIENT(S): One thousand ninety-three primiparous mothers registered in the Dutch National Birth Registry who gave birth to a dizygotic (DZ) twin (male/female) in 1994, 1995, and 1996. We compared 613 natural twin pregnancies and 480 twin pregnancies born after assisted reproduction.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Gestational length, mode of delivery, mode of presentation of the children, birth weight, APGAR score, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality rate, highest recorded maternal diastolic blood pressure, and maternal postpartum complications.
RESULT(S): Rates of perinatal mortality and very premature parturition (<29 weeks) were lower in natural twin mothers. Overall, induced DZ twins were born 3.5 days earlier with a lower birth weight and APGAR score compared with controls. Rates of congenital anomalies and incidence of cesarean section were not different. The highest recorded diastolic blood pressure was lower in induced twinning with a 30% lower incidence of diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg.
CONCLUSION(S): Obstetric outcome for induced DZ twin pregnancy is less optimal than in natural DZ twin pregnancy. Twinning in assisted reproduction is known for its contribution to the high rate of premature deliveries, but in addition being a subfertile patient undergoing treatment makes an intrinsic contribution to adverse events as well.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app