We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Clinical and histopathological analysis of tissue retraction in tumescent liposuction assisted by external ultrasound.
Annals of Plastic Surgery 2001 March
Multiple subjective evaluations and valuations in clinical studies have suggested that the use of external ultrasound in liposuction favors the degree of tissue retraction. However, studies do not exist that evaluate with objective parameters the degree of tissue retraction after liposuction assisted with external ultrasound. It is for this reason that a comparative clinical trial was carried out in 13 female patients to establish clinically and histopathologically the degree of tissue retraction that is produced after tumescent liposuction assisted by external ultrasound compared with the classic tumescent technique. All patients were tattooed in each hemiabdomen with reference points that formed a 7 x 7-cm square. Abdominal tumescent liposuction was carried out in all patients, with external ultrasound applied to the right hemiabdomen only, and without specifying to the patient the side on which the ultrasound was applied. The areas were measured and biopsies were acquired in each hemiabdomen 72 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. The samples were evaluated by the same pathologist in a double-blind study. A survey of the patients was carried out regarding their appreciation of the results at the end of 3 months. On physical evaluation of the tattooed square, none of the thirteen patients presented significant differences in skin retraction (95% dependability by means of Student's t-test). The histological results showed that external ultrasound increased the degree of edema, vascular congestion, and inflammatory infiltration in the dermis during the first 3 months postoperatively. However, after 6 months no differences existed. Clinically, no patient observed a marked difference between the two hemiabdominal areas; an equal aesthetic result was obtained on both sides. In this clinical comparative trial, external ultrasound as a complementary method to tumescent liposuction did not increase the degree of tissue retraction after the liposuction, nor did it prove to be a determining factor in the immediate postoperative evolution.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app