We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Radiographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Radiation Medicine 2001 January
PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
METHODS: We evaluated the radiographic features of 61 cases of histopathologically documented invasive lobular carcinoma. Mammography was performed in all cases. In seven of 61 cases, helical CT with contrast medium was also carried out. Mammographic findings were analyzed to determine true-positive and false-negative rates for the detection of neoplasm. Further, the diameter of the tumor as determined on mammography and helical CT was noted for comparison with the pathologic size.
RESULTS: Mammographic features were divided into six types: spiculated mass (38%), indistinct mass (5%), obscured mass (23%), asymmetric opacity (16%), architectural distortion (16%), and no findings (2%). Microcalcifications were present in 12 cases (20%). The overall sensitivity rate was 59%. However, 20 (56%) of 36 cases that were diagnosed as detectable on mammography were underestimated in terms of tumor size compared with the histopathologic findings. Four cases examined by helical CT with contrast medium were compared with the histopathologic findings in terms of extent of the lesion. In three cases, helical CT was more precise than mammography, but the histopathologic findings showed lesions beyond the region evaluated by helical CT.
CONCLUSION: Invasive lobular carcinoma is difficult to detect radiographically, and the extent of the lesion tends to be underestimated.
METHODS: We evaluated the radiographic features of 61 cases of histopathologically documented invasive lobular carcinoma. Mammography was performed in all cases. In seven of 61 cases, helical CT with contrast medium was also carried out. Mammographic findings were analyzed to determine true-positive and false-negative rates for the detection of neoplasm. Further, the diameter of the tumor as determined on mammography and helical CT was noted for comparison with the pathologic size.
RESULTS: Mammographic features were divided into six types: spiculated mass (38%), indistinct mass (5%), obscured mass (23%), asymmetric opacity (16%), architectural distortion (16%), and no findings (2%). Microcalcifications were present in 12 cases (20%). The overall sensitivity rate was 59%. However, 20 (56%) of 36 cases that were diagnosed as detectable on mammography were underestimated in terms of tumor size compared with the histopathologic findings. Four cases examined by helical CT with contrast medium were compared with the histopathologic findings in terms of extent of the lesion. In three cases, helical CT was more precise than mammography, but the histopathologic findings showed lesions beyond the region evaluated by helical CT.
CONCLUSION: Invasive lobular carcinoma is difficult to detect radiographically, and the extent of the lesion tends to be underestimated.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app