We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The influence of gender on the short and long-term effects of growth hormone replacement on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in hypopituitary adults: a 5-year study.
Clinical Endocrinology 2001 April
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of GH replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) on activation of bone remodelling during dose titration and on BMD over a median of 58 months of continuous therapy.
STUDY DESIGN: Open label study in adult patients with GHD. rhGH was commenced at dose of 0.8 IU subcutaneously daily (0.4 IU if hypertensive or glucose tolerance impaired) with subsequent dose titration based on 2 weekly measurement of serum IGF-I until levels reached the target range (between the median and upper end of the age related reference range). In patients previously commenced on GH using weight based regimens the dose of GH was adjusted during clinical follow-up in order to maintain serum IGF-I in the target range.
PATIENTS: Initial effects of GH on bone remodelling during dose titration were studied in 17 patients (8F). Long-term effects of GH were determined in a separate group of 13 GHD adults (6F) over a median period of 58 months (range 44-72).
MEASUREMENTS: Osteoblastic activity was estimated by measuring serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (S-BAP). BMD was determined at both lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
RESULTS: During dose titration a significant increment in S-BAP was observed by 10 weeks in females but occurred later in males (12-26 weeks). In the long term treatment group there was a significant increment in S-BAP compared to baseline (P = 0.013) after 6 months GH treatment. After long-term GH treatment (median 58 months) S-BAP levels decreased and were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline at the end of the study period. A similar response was observed in male and female patients. There were no significant differences in baseline BMD between male and female patients at either lumbar spine or femoral neck in the long term treatment group. No significant changes were observed in BMD after 6 months GH treatment in either lumbar spine or femoral neck but BMD increased over the remainder of the study at both sites (P = 0.023 and P = 0.03 respectively). When analysed by gender male patients showed a clear positive change in BMD after longer-term replacement in both lumbar spine and femoral neck (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02 respectively) but female patients showed no significant changes. Qualitatively similar results were observed when analysing changes in BMD expressed as Z scores.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an earlier onset of GH activation of bone remodelling as reflected by S-BAP in females compared to males and confirms that long-term GH treatment in hypopituitary adults with GH deficiency increases or preserves BMD both at lumbar spine and femoral neck. However male patients seem to derive the greater benefits in BMD from long-term GH replacement; in females BMD appears simply to be stabilized rather than increased. This constitutes a genuine gender difference in susceptibility given that serum IGF-I was in the upper part of the reference range in all subjects.
STUDY DESIGN: Open label study in adult patients with GHD. rhGH was commenced at dose of 0.8 IU subcutaneously daily (0.4 IU if hypertensive or glucose tolerance impaired) with subsequent dose titration based on 2 weekly measurement of serum IGF-I until levels reached the target range (between the median and upper end of the age related reference range). In patients previously commenced on GH using weight based regimens the dose of GH was adjusted during clinical follow-up in order to maintain serum IGF-I in the target range.
PATIENTS: Initial effects of GH on bone remodelling during dose titration were studied in 17 patients (8F). Long-term effects of GH were determined in a separate group of 13 GHD adults (6F) over a median period of 58 months (range 44-72).
MEASUREMENTS: Osteoblastic activity was estimated by measuring serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (S-BAP). BMD was determined at both lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
RESULTS: During dose titration a significant increment in S-BAP was observed by 10 weeks in females but occurred later in males (12-26 weeks). In the long term treatment group there was a significant increment in S-BAP compared to baseline (P = 0.013) after 6 months GH treatment. After long-term GH treatment (median 58 months) S-BAP levels decreased and were no longer statistically significantly different from baseline at the end of the study period. A similar response was observed in male and female patients. There were no significant differences in baseline BMD between male and female patients at either lumbar spine or femoral neck in the long term treatment group. No significant changes were observed in BMD after 6 months GH treatment in either lumbar spine or femoral neck but BMD increased over the remainder of the study at both sites (P = 0.023 and P = 0.03 respectively). When analysed by gender male patients showed a clear positive change in BMD after longer-term replacement in both lumbar spine and femoral neck (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02 respectively) but female patients showed no significant changes. Qualitatively similar results were observed when analysing changes in BMD expressed as Z scores.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an earlier onset of GH activation of bone remodelling as reflected by S-BAP in females compared to males and confirms that long-term GH treatment in hypopituitary adults with GH deficiency increases or preserves BMD both at lumbar spine and femoral neck. However male patients seem to derive the greater benefits in BMD from long-term GH replacement; in females BMD appears simply to be stabilized rather than increased. This constitutes a genuine gender difference in susceptibility given that serum IGF-I was in the upper part of the reference range in all subjects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app