We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI.
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery 2000 December
BACKGROUND: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible.
PATIENTS: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed.
RESULTS: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A nonsignificant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only.
CONCLUSION: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
PATIENTS: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed.
RESULTS: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A nonsignificant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only.
CONCLUSION: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app