We have located links that may give you full text access.
The effects of tibial rotation on posterior translation in knees in which the posterior cruciate ligament has been cut.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2001 September
BACKGROUND: One of the most useful clinical tests for diagnosing an isolated injury of the posterior cruciate ligament is the posterior drawer maneuver performed with the knee in 90 degrees of flexion. Previously, it was thought that internally rotating the tibia during posterior drawer testing would decrease posterior laxity in a knee with an isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury. In this study, we evaluated the effects of internal and external tibial rotation on posterior laxity with the knee held in varying degrees of flexion after the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments had been cut.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty cadaveric knees were used. Each knee was mounted in a fixture with six degrees of freedom, and anterior and posterior forces of 150 N were applied. The testing was conducted with the knee in 90 degrees, 60 degrees, 30 degrees, and 0 degrees of flexion with the tibia in neutral, internal, and external rotation. All knees were tested with the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments intact and transected. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: At 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion, there was a significant increase in posterior laxity following transection of the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments. At 60 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion, there was significantly less posterior laxity when the tibia was held in internal compared with external rotation. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion, there was no significant difference in posterior laxity when the tibia was held in internal compared with external rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: After the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments had been cut, posterior laxity was significantly decreased by both internal and external rotation of the tibia. Internal tibial rotation resulted in significantly less laxity than external tibial rotation did at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty cadaveric knees were used. Each knee was mounted in a fixture with six degrees of freedom, and anterior and posterior forces of 150 N were applied. The testing was conducted with the knee in 90 degrees, 60 degrees, 30 degrees, and 0 degrees of flexion with the tibia in neutral, internal, and external rotation. All knees were tested with the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments intact and transected. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: At 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion, there was a significant increase in posterior laxity following transection of the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments. At 60 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion, there was significantly less posterior laxity when the tibia was held in internal compared with external rotation. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion, there was no significant difference in posterior laxity when the tibia was held in internal compared with external rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: After the posterior cruciate and meniscofemoral ligaments had been cut, posterior laxity was significantly decreased by both internal and external rotation of the tibia. Internal tibial rotation resulted in significantly less laxity than external tibial rotation did at 60 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app